CiteGaps
See where AI assistants cite your competitors, then close the gap.
See where AI assistants cite your competitors, then close the gap.
This page is designed to help you find out whether CiteGaps is good and if it is the right choice for you.
CiteGaps tracks how your brand appears in AI answer engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews.
Every week it asks 25 to 100 buyer questions for your market and records which brands each answer names, in what order, and which websites it cites. You get your visibility share and citation share against named competitors, the sources the engines trust, and a prioritised list of fixes, each linked to the answers that show the gap. CiteGaps also drafts the content to close it: FAQ pages, comparison pages and outreach.
Agencies get up to 5 brands and white-label weekly PDF reports. Plans start at $19 a month with a 7-day money-back guarantee, and there is a free one-question check with no sign-up.
Listed in
Promote CiteGaps. You can add any of these badges on your website.
TypeScript, Node.js, React and Vite, on Google Firebase: Cloud Functions, Firestore, Authentication and Hosting. Google Gemini reads the AI answers and drafts content. Payments run on Razorpay and email on Resend.
Most AI visibility tools stop at a score. CiteGaps also writes the fix. Every week it asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews the questions your buyers ask. It shows how often you're named against your competitors and which sources the engines trust. Then it drafts the FAQ page, comparison page or outreach that closes each gap, and links every recommendation to the exact answers that prove it.
It drafts the content, not just a brief or a to-do list. Flat monthly price for a set number of questions. No credits to count, no add-ons. Plans start at $19 a month. Answers are collected live from the engines, as your buyers see them. A PDF report lands in your inbox every Monday, white-labelled with your logo on the Agency plan. 7-day money-back guarantee, and a free one-question check with no sign-up.
Founders and marketing teams at small and mid-sized software and online businesses, whose buyers now ask AI assistants which product to choose. Also SEO and content agencies that want weekly, branded AI visibility reports for their clients.
We built CiteGaps while launching our own product, a domain-monitoring tool. We'd done the usual SEO work, then asked ChatGPT and Gemini the questions our buyers ask. Across 50 answers, our product was named in 2%, and our biggest competitor in 38%. No analytics tool showed us this, because those buyers never reached our site. So we built the tool we needed: it asks the AI engines our buyers' questions every week, shows who gets recommended and which sources they cite, and drafts the pages that close the gap.
Profound, Peec AI, Otterly.AI, Semrush, Ahrefs
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if CiteGaps is good.
Check the traffic stats of CiteGaps on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of CiteGaps on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of CiteGaps's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of CiteGaps on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about CiteGaps on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing CiteGaps to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is CiteGaps good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss CiteGaps here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
