
Coverity Scan
Veracode
SonarQube
Appknox
Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Netsparker
Snyk
The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

ASP.NET
ASP.NET Core
Django
Laravel
Ruby on Rails
Spring Framework
Flask
CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Checkmarx should be more popular than CodeBehind Framework. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | checkmarx.com | elanat.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2023 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Checkmarx yet.
CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner
More videos
No CodeBehind Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Checkmarx and CodeBehind Framework.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
Share your experience with using Checkmarx and CodeBehind Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Why We Picked Checkmarx SAST: We like Checkmarx SAST for its early detection of vulnerabilities, which enables faster and safer code development. Its AI-assisted prioritization of vulnerabilities according to severity...
Checkmarx is a developer-centric security tool that specializes in secure coding practices and compliance. It helps developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their code, ensuring that their applications...
While SonarQube offers some security features, Checkmarx provides a more holistic approach to application security, covering a more comprehensive range of security aspects throughout the SDLC. Checkmarx One's...
We have no reviews of CodeBehind Framework yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It works, and it's SQL injection. Semgrep Code catches it with the engine you already run for architecture (add --config p/owasp-top-ten). CodeQL is free for public repos and shows results in the PR. Snyk Code and Checkmarx cover the... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
Tools like OWASP ZAP are excellent for dynamic application security testing, while SonarQube and Checkmarx specialize in static security testing. These tools integrate seamlessly into your pipeline, automating checks and enabling you to... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
When comparing Checkmarx and CodeBehind Framework, you can also consider the following products.

Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Compare Coverity Scan to Checkmarx or CodeBehind Framework:

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
Compare ASP.NET to Checkmarx or CodeBehind Framework:

Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.
Compare Veracode to Checkmarx or CodeBehind Framework:


SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Compare SonarQube to Checkmarx or CodeBehind Framework:

The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Compare Django to Checkmarx or CodeBehind Framework: