CHANGELOG.md VS CloudLinux

• Standardized format
  CHANGELOG.md promotes the use of a standardized, human-readable format for documenting project changes, making it easier for developers and users to understand what has changed between versions.
• Improved project transparency
  By maintaining a well-structured changelog, projects become more transparent about their development history, bug fixes, new features, and breaking changes, which builds trust with users and contributors.
• Based on Keep a Changelog principles
  The approach follows the widely adopted 'Keep a Changelog' convention, which is a well-known standard in the open-source community, making it familiar and easy to adopt for most developers.
• Markdown-based simplicity
  Using Markdown as the format means changelogs are easy to write, read in plain text, and render beautifully on platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket without requiring special tooling.
• Facilitates semantic versioning
  CHANGELOG.md encourages pairing changelog entries with semantic versioning (SemVer), helping teams communicate the impact of changes clearly—whether they are patches, minor updates, or major breaking changes.

Possible disadvantages

• Manual maintenance burden
  Keeping a CHANGELOG.md file up to date requires manual effort and discipline. If team members forget to update it or do so inconsistently, the changelog can quickly become outdated or incomplete.
• No automated generation
  Unlike tools that auto-generate changelogs from commit messages or pull requests, a manually maintained CHANGELOG.md doesn't automatically capture changes, which can lead to missed entries.
• Subjective content quality
  The quality and detail of changelog entries depend entirely on the contributors writing them. Without clear guidelines, entries may vary significantly in usefulness, detail, and formatting.
• Duplication of effort
  Teams may find themselves duplicating information already present in commit messages, pull request descriptions, or issue trackers, leading to redundant documentation work.
• Merge conflicts in collaborative projects
  In active projects with many contributors, the CHANGELOG.md file can become a frequent source of merge conflicts since multiple people may be editing the same file near the same lines simultaneously.

• Enhanced Server Stability
  CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
• Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
  CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
• Resource Limit Management
  Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
• CageFS File System Virtualization
  CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
• Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
  CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

• Additional Licensing Cost
  CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
• Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
  CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
• Learning Curve for Configuration
  While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
• Potential Performance Overhead
  The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
• Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
  Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

No CHANGELOG.md videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

• Sample .desktop files for Nautilus templates?

  Weirdly, though, when double click the .desktop file in Dolphin (which is not how you normally instantiate templates, but I was curious) it tried to open the URL readme.md in a web browser (currently a real web URL that redirects to... Source: over 3 years ago

• That one coworker

  I sincerely hope you guys have a changelog.md in the project. Source: almost 4 years ago

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.