Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CatchJS VS TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging

Compare CatchJS VS TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging and see what are their differences

CatchJS logo CatchJS

Unbloated, yet feature rich. CatchJS provides JavaScript Error Tracking the way it should be.

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging logo TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging

JavaScript Error Monitoring from TrackJS gives you context about what's happening in your end-users' browsers.
  • CatchJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14

CatchJS features and specs

  • Error Tracking
    CatchJS provides efficient tracking of JavaScript errors in web applications, allowing developers to easily identify and fix issues.
  • Real-time Alerts
    It offers real-time alerts for errors, enabling developers to respond promptly to issues as they arise, improving the application's reliability.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    The platform generates detailed error reports, including stack traces and contextual information, which assist in debugging and understanding the root cause of problems.
  • User-friendly Interface
    CatchJS boasts a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for developers to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The service supports integrations with other tools and platforms, allowing for a seamless workflow within a developer's existing tech stack.

Possible disadvantages of CatchJS

  • Pricing
    CatchJS may have a subscription cost, which could be a concern for small startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Some users may find the initial setup and configuration process a bit complex, especially if they are not familiar with similar error tracking tools.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based service, it relies on internet connectivity for tracking and reporting, which could be a limitation in offline scenarios.
  • Scope Limitation
    CatchJS may primarily focus on JavaScript errors, which might not cover all aspects of a full-stack application's error tracking needs.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    There might be a learning curve for new users, especially those who haven't used error tracking tools before, impacting initial productivity.

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging features and specs

  • Real-time Error Tracking
    TrackJS offers real-time insights into JavaScript errors, allowing developers to identify and address issues quickly as they arise.
  • User Context
    Provides detailed context about the user and the application's state at the time of the error, which is crucial for reproducing and fixing bugs.
  • Simple Integration
    TrackJS can be easily integrated into applications, requiring minimal setup to start monitoring errors.
  • Error Filtering
    Allows developers to filter and prioritize errors based on various criteria, making it easier to focus on the most critical issues.
  • Customer Support
    Offers excellent customer support to help developers troubleshoot and maximize the tool's potential.

Possible disadvantages of TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging

  • Pricing
    May be considered expensive for smaller projects or startups with limited budgets compared to some open-source or lower-cost alternatives.
  • Data Privacy
    Like any error tracking service, it requires sending data to third-party servers, which might be a concern for projects with strict data privacy requirements.
  • Complexity with Custom Errors
    Handling and configuring custom errors can be complex for advanced use cases, potentially requiring extra effort from developers.
  • Learning Curve
    While integration is generally straightforward, some developers may experience a learning curve in fully utilizing all of TrackJS's features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CatchJS and TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging)
Error Tracking
46 46%
54% 54
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Crash Reporting
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CatchJS and TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CatchJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CatchJS mentions (1)

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging yet. Tracking of TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CatchJS and TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

Bugfender - Cloud logging for your apps, not only crashes matter

AirBrake - Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking.

Bird Eats Bug - Saw a bug? Send an instant replay to engineers. It will come with console logs and everything. Developers will ❤️ you.