Can I use Reviews

DebugTool Reviews

1. Ernesto Lasso

   · Design project manager at Sriservices · about 4 years ago
   Save time and deliver projects faster

   We work in an agency that develops websites mainly in WordPress, and regularly based on our experience over several years of working with multiple clients, we have discovered that one of the main problems between agency-client is communication, which often sometimes is tedious and fruitless, but now with the visual debugger is easy to point in the screen what needs to be changed and do it quickly. Also, we had a problem calculating how much our will cost our services for the customers according to the time spent on their projects but now with the "Time tracking" function, we can know exactly how much time was dedicated to the project and based on that invoice the client with greater certainty.

   I think this is a great solution for web designers that needs to clear all visual bugs of a website fast to deliver in less time and get more jobs quickly.

   🏁 Competitors: Webvizio, Atarim

   👍 Pros:    Easy to install|Very good money/value|Saves a ton of time

   👎 Cons:    New

Can I use mentions (410)

• JavaScript ES2026 - 10 New Features That Will Change How Developers Write Code

  Engine support is still catching up as of mid-2026 check caniuse.com or node.green before shipping any of this to production without a fallback. Temporal in particular is brand new to the spec after years in Stage 3, so browser support (Safari especially) is the long pole. But for Node.js backends and evergreen-browser frontends, most of this list is either already usable or one polyfill away. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

• 98% Isn't Much

  I usually go by CanIUse's global percentage when deciding if I can utilize a new browser feature, and right now it's 90.81% (https://caniuse.com/css-nesting) That's a bit lower than I would be comfortable with, however not that bad, we have been even considering switching all our images to AVIF:. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago

• UUID: NewV7() always generates a UUID with 7000 on browsers (Golang)

  > This is because NewV7 assumes that the wallclock timer always has microsecond or nanosecond precision, though a browser's wallclock (new Date.getTime()) is millisecond precision. That's true of Date, but not Temporal, which supported in most cases. [1] There needs to be a fallback, but `Temporal.Now.instant()` is nanosecond-precise. [1] https://caniuse.com/?search=temporal. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Node.js 26.0.0 (Now with Temporal)

  Off-topic, but, Safari seems to be the only browser that doesn't support Temporal yet. It looks like the only blocker for adopting it on web. https://caniuse.com/?search=Temporal. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• Learning the Web Platform APIs As If You Built Them Yourself

  Browser support varies. Use caniuse.com before committing. For features you must have everywhere, polyfills exist. For features that gracefully degrade, feature detect with if ("foo" in window) and ship the better experience to capable browsers. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

DebugTool mentions (0)