Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CA Workload Automation CA7 VS Control-M

Compare CA Workload Automation CA7 VS Control-M and see what are their differences

CA Workload Automation CA7 logo CA Workload Automation CA7

CA Workload Automation CA 7

Control-M logo Control-M

Controlโ€‘M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • CA Workload Automation CA7 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-23
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

CA Workload Automation CA7 features and specs

  • Robust Scheduling
    CA Workload Automation CA7 offers robust scheduling capabilities that allow users to automate complex job schedules, reducing manual workload and increasing efficiency.
  • Scalability
    The platform is highly scalable and can handle a large number of jobs and processes, making it suitable for enterprise-level operations.
  • Integration
    CA7 can be integrated with various other systems and applications, providing a streamlined workflow across different platforms and environments.
  • Reliability
    Known for its reliability, CA7 ensures that jobs are executed on time and in the correct order, minimizing downtime and errors.
  • Resource Management
    The tool offers efficient resource management features, allowing users to allocate resources effectively and avoid bottlenecks in processing.

Possible disadvantages of CA Workload Automation CA7

  • Complexity
    The system can be quite complex to set up and configure, requiring specialized knowledge and training for optimal use.
  • Cost
    The licensing and maintenance costs can be high, which might not be feasible for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the interface outdated and not as user-friendly compared to newer automation tools, which may lead to a steeper learning curve.
  • Customization
    While feature-rich, the system may require significant customization to meet specific business needs, leading to increased implementation time and effort.
  • Dependence on Mainframe
    CA7 is heavily tied to mainframe environments, which can be a disadvantage for companies moving towards more modern, cloud-based solutions.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

CA Workload Automation CA7 videos

No CA Workload Automation CA7 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CA Workload Automation CA7 and Control-M)
Workflow Automation
23 23%
77% 77
IT Automation
20 20%
80% 80
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Product Deployment
26 26%
74% 74

User comments

Share your experience with using CA Workload Automation CA7 and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CA Workload Automation CA7 and Control-M

CA Workload Automation CA7 Reviews

We have no reviews of CA Workload Automation CA7 yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in โ€™23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CA Workload Automation CA7 and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.