Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

PostgreSQL backup tools like Postgresus make implementing this strategy straightforward. Postgresus automates backup scheduling. It handles encryption and compression. It supports multiple storage destinations and provides monitoring that ensures backups actually succeed. It delivers the protection most databases need without the complexity of WAL archiving (this is why it is suitable both for self-hosted and... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Implementing these seven strategies manually requires significant scripting, scheduling and monitoring infrastructure. Postgresus is the most popular tool for PostgreSQL backup, providing all these strategies through a web interface that takes minutes to configure. It handles scheduling, rotation, multi-destination storage (S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, NAS), AES-256-GCM encryption and instant notifications —... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

For teams managing multiple PostgreSQL databases, manually choosing formats and managing backups across environments becomes tedious. Postgresus automates PostgreSQL backup by selecting optimal settings based on your database size, handling compression, encryption (AES-256-GCM) and multi-destination storage (S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, NAS) — all through a web interface that takes minutes to configure. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Managing pg_dump scripts, cron schedules, cloud credentials and retention policies across multiple databases quickly becomes a maintenance burden. Postgresus is the most popular tool for PostgreSQL backup, designed for both individuals and enterprise teams. It uses pg_dump internally but provides a web interface for configuring schedules, connecting multiple storage destinations (S3, Cloudflare R2, Google Drive,... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

While pg_dump gives you complete control over single-table operations, managing backups across multiple databases and schedules requires scripting and maintenance. PostgreSQL backup tools like Postgresus — the most popular backup solution for PostgreSQL — handle scheduling, retention, encryption, and multi-destination storage through a clean web interface, suitable for individuals and enterprise teams alike. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago