Buildah VS Makerkit.dev
Compare Buildah VS Makerkit.dev and see what are their differences
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts.
sponsored
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
Makerkit.dev
ShipFa.st
supastarter
Nexty.dev
MkSaaS
SaaSykit
StarterKitPro
Next SaaS Starter
Makerkit is a production-ready SaaS starter kit built with Next.js App Router and Supabase that helps developers launch faster.
It provides a robust foundation with built-in authentication, team management, billing integration, and Super Admin - all powered by a modular architecture that makes customization and maintenance a breeze.
Whether you're building a B2B or B2C application, Makerkit handles the complex infrastructure so you can focus on building your product's unique features using modern tools like TypeScript, React, and Tailwind CSS.
Buildah Makerkit.devNo Makerkit.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Indie Hackers and Companies who want to launch quickly, without compromising on quality.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit uses Next.js 15 (App Router), Supabase, React.js, Typescript and Stripe.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit stands out by offering a truly modular architecture built with Turborepo, where core features like auth, billing, and notifications live in their own packages for better maintainability.
While most starters lock you into specific patterns or providers, Makerkit gives you flexibility with a multi-account system supporting both B2B and B2C scenarios, provider-agnostic billing, and edge-ready deployment options.
Beyond the basics, it includes production-ready features like multi-factor auth, real-time notifications, and team permissions - all built with Supabase, TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling to make development a genuine pleasure.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
While other starters give you basic auth and a dashboard, Makerkit provides a genuinely modular foundation with the real features SaaS products need - like multi-factor auth, team permissions, real-time notifications, and provider-agnostic billing, all organized in clean, maintainable packages using Turborepo.
You get a first-class developer experience with TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling, plus the flexibility to support both B2B and B2C scenarios, different payment providers, and edge deployment options.
Best of all, Makerkit is actively maintained with regular updates and responsive support, so you're building on a foundation that grows with your needs rather than painting yourself into a corner.
Based on our record, Buildah should be more popular than Makerkit.dev. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Price: $299 (Pro, individual) / $599 (Teams, 5 collaborators) - one-time, lifetime access URL: makerkit.dev. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I saw these ones mentioned in an HN comment: - https://achromatic.dev - https://makerkit.dev - https://www.spirokit.com/ - https://saasykit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
ShipFa.st - The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
supastarter - The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
Nexty.dev - Launch your SaaS in days, not weeks. Nexty.dev is a production-ready Next.js and Supabase starter template for building modern SaaS applications. Launch your content, AI, or subscription service faster.