
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
CodeStream
Refactor.io
Figstack
PullRequest.com
GitLive
Azure DevOps
codebeat
Promyze
CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.
CodeStreamDevelopment teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.
After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.
Based on our record, Buildah seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
PullRequest.com - Code review as a service