
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
CodeClimate
Codacy
SonarQube
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
CodeFactor.io
Source-Navigator NG
Buildah
CodeClimateCodeClimate might be a bit more popular than Buildah. We know about 19 links to it since March 2021 and only 14 links to Buildah. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Automated analysis tools: SonarQube, CodeClimate, and Codacy detect code-level debt automatically: cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, dependency staleness, and coverage gaps. These tools supplement but don't replace the architectural and business-logic debt that requires human judgment to identify and document. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
CodeClimate and Codacy can generate before/after metrics for code quality that make the starting and ending states concrete rather than subjective. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
CodeClimate quantifies maintainability so teams canโt hand-wave garbage away. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Code Climate: Link - Automated code review and quality analysis for codebase health. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Use tools like SonarQube or CodeClimate to spot the high-risk 20%. Then fix one thing at a time not everything at once. This isnโt Dark Souls. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool