
CircleCI
Jenkins
Travis CI
Codeship
GitLab
Semaphore
TeamCity
The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

Webhook.site
Hoppscotch
MockServer
Mockoon
Request inspector
RequestBin
API Fortress
Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.
Which is more popular?
Beeceptor might be a bit more popular than Buddy. We know about 13 links to it since March 2021 and only 10 links to Buddy.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | buddy.works | beeceptor.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Company | 2015 | 2017 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Buddy is a smart CI/CD tool for web developers designed to lower the entry threshold to DevOps. FEATURES: 15-minute configuration in clear & telling UI/UX Lightning-fast deployments based on changesets Builds are run in isolated containers with cached dependencies Supports all popular...
If you've ever found yourself stuck during software development because a micro-service or 3rd party API wasn't available, then API Mocking is the solution you've been looking for. Beeceptor is a versatile tool that can help you with many different API development use cases. Whether...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Buddy - CI/CD The Easy Way
More videos
How to use Beeceptor
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Buddy and Beeceptor.
Beeceptor's answer:
Beeceptor stands out for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for intercepting and mocking real-time HTTP and HTTPS requests without requiring code changes, extensive setup, new dependencies, etc.
Beeceptor's answer:
Beeceptor's primary audience includes software developers, QA engineers, and product managers who are involved in the development and testing phases of web and mobile applications.
Share your experience with using Buddy and Beeceptor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Buddy, a newcomer in the CI/CD realm, is liked for its simple interface and smooth process. Although Buddy might not offer as many complex functions like other better-known options, its straightforwardness and ease to...
Buddy is another reasonable alternative to Jenkins. It is an open-source CI/CD tool that is known for its ultra-quick application deployment. According to their official website, it takes 12 seconds of average time to...
Buddy is a CI/CD tool which removes the chores of configuring and managing Jenkins with a smart UI/UX that makes it very easy to build, test, and deploy quality software faster – no need for a full-time DevOps...
We have no reviews of Beeceptor yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Buddy CI/CD is an automation platform designed to streamline and accelerate software development and deployment processes. By emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, Buddy offers an intuitive UI that allows teams to set up, monitor, and... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
We switched to buddy.works[0] about a year ago and honestly it’s just been… smooth. The UI is just great, the wealth and breadth of options is ever increasing and all the basics like knowing what went wrong, restarting, debugging,... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
For continuous integration, we are using Buddy delivery pipelines which allow us to build, test and deploy applications on a single push to a specific git branch. It helps us to reduce the manual overhead of deploying code to the server... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
Webhook.site exists. Beeceptor exists. Ngrok exists in this space. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
This is exactly where Beeceptor’s stateful mocking come in to transform your development workflow. You can implement real data persistence without requiring to set up a single database, instantly unblocking your frontend and QA teams. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Visit Mockbin.io, Beeceptor or RequestBin and click "Create endpoint." These platforms instantly generate a unique URL that captures incoming HTTP requests. Copy the provided URL, something like https://your-webhook-endpoint.com/hook. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
When comparing Buddy and Beeceptor, you can also consider the following products.

CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
Compare CircleCI to Buddy or Beeceptor:

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
Compare Webhook.site to Buddy or Beeceptor:

Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Compare Jenkins to Buddy or Beeceptor:


Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.
Compare Travis CI to Buddy or Beeceptor:

Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.
Compare MockServer to Buddy or Beeceptor: