Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bruno VS Hurl.dev

Compare Bruno VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

Bruno logo Bruno

Bruno is a Git-integrated, fully offline, and open-source API client

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
Not present
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

Bruno features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Bruno offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize the platform's features effectively.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    The platform provides a wide array of features that cater to different needs, ensuring that users have the tools necessary to achieve their objectives.
  • Regular Updates
    Bruno is consistently updated with new features and improvements, keeping the platform relevant and responsive to user feedback.
  • Strong Customer Support
    Users have access to reliable and friendly customer support, helping to resolve any issues or questions promptly.

Possible disadvantages of Bruno

  • Learning Curve for New Users
    Although the interface is user-friendly, new users may require some time to get fully accustomed to all the advanced features.
  • Pricing
    For some users, the cost of using Bruno might be higher compared to similar tools in the market, which can be a consideration for budget-conscious users.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    As a primarily online platform, Bruno offers limited functionality when offline, which might be a drawback for users with inconsistent internet access.

Hurl.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages of Hurl.dev

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

Bruno videos

Bruno Male Enhancement Review 2025: Ingredients, Side Effects, Where to Buy NZ - Bruno male reviews

More videos:

Hurl.dev videos

No Hurl.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bruno and Hurl.dev)
API Tools
61 61%
39% 39
Command Line Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
56 56%
44% 44
APIs
59 59%
41% 41

User comments

Share your experience with using Bruno and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev seems to be a lot more popular than Bruno. While we know about 60 links to Hurl.dev, we've tracked only 1 mention of Bruno. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bruno mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Yaak โ€“ An Open Source, Git-Friendly Desktop API Client
    Would love to see a comparison with Bruno[1]. [1]: https://usebruno.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Hurl.dev mentions (60)

  • Show HN: APIs as First-Class Citizen
    }; ``` I've carefully studied tools like gRPC/TypeSpec, but I'm not entirely satisfied. Since I have prior experience writing parsers and code generation tools, I finally decided to create my ownโ€”[XIDL](https://github.com/xidl/xidl). I made the following improvements: First, I generated the trait and OpenAPI documentation using `xidl-build`, thus resolving the inconsistency in OpenAPI generation time. Second, I... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • Hurl vs Postman: Git-Friendly API Testing With Proxy-Aware Egress (2026)
    If any of that sounds familiar, Iโ€™d recommend finally taking the big step and replacing your Postman collection with Hurl โ€” a command-line HTTP test runner where tests are plain **.hurl** text files that live in Git. For this tutorial, Iโ€™ll also walk you through multi-region testing โ€” how to run those tests using a proxy to get a German egress IP, and see what the API actually returns from there. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Yapi โ€“ Terminal API Client for Power Users
    Hurl's another great option for this https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Postman which I thought worked locally on my computer, is down
    Allow me to introduce you to Hurl: https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Just Use Curl
    There's also hurl: https://hurl.dev You define all your requests in a plaintext format and can inject variables etc... Plus the name is kinda funny. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bruno and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a devโ€‘friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Kreya - GUI Client - Kreya is a GUI client for gRPC and REST APIs with innovative features for environments, authorizations and more.

Thunder Client - Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative