Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserStack VS Testcontainers

Compare BrowserStack VS Testcontainers and see what are their differences

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Testcontainers logo Testcontainers

Testcontainers is a modern Java library that comes with the exclusive support of Junit tests.
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • Testcontainers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

Testcontainers

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Testcontainers features and specs

  • Isolation
    Testcontainers provides a high level of isolation for tests by using Docker containers, ensuring that each test runs in a clean environment without interference from the previous tests.
  • Realistic Testing
    By using actual instances of services like databases or message brokers, Testcontainers allow for more realistic integration and end-to-end testing scenarios.
  • Ease of Use
    Testcontainers simplifies the setup of complex environments, allowing developers to quickly specify the containers they need without extensive configuration.
  • Cross-Platform
    As Testcontainers rely on Docker, they are inherently cross-platform and can be used on any system that supports Docker, such as Windows, Mac, and Linux.
  • Compatibility with CI/CD
    Testcontainers can be seamlessly integrated into CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated testing with consistent environments on every build.

Possible disadvantages of Testcontainers

  • Docker Dependency
    Testcontainers requires Docker to be installed and running on the host machine, which may be an additional dependency that some environments do not support.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running tests in Docker containers can introduce additional resource overhead, which may slow down test execution compared to running tests natively.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in a containerized environment can be more complex due to the additional layer of abstraction, requiring familiarity with Docker commands and tools.
  • Limited UI Testing
    Testcontainers are more suited to backend and integration testing rather than UI testing, as graphical applications can be challenging to run in a headless container.

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Testcontainers videos

Testcontainers – From Zero to Hero

More videos:

  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)
  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and Testcontainers)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
95 95%
5% 5
Automated Testing
92 92%
8% 8

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and Testcontainers. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and Testcontainers

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Testcontainers Reviews

We have no reviews of Testcontainers yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Testcontainers should be more popular than BrowserStack. It has been mentiond 40 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

Testcontainers mentions (40)

  • Testing MongoDB Atlas Search Java Apps Using TestContainers
    Even though we’re going to be using the Java TestContainers project here, TestContainers is available for lots of languages and platforms. You can check it out on their website. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
  • Spring Boot AI Evaluation Testing
    Start Docker Compose with both Ollama and PGVector using Testcontainers. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • How to test Umbraco against a real database
    In my last post about Test Driven Development, I briefly touched on testing with a real database and how I used TestContainers to do it. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: Go libraries for managing Docker container pools and executing commands
    Our use case is to execute test scripts in a sandbox mode. This is multi host and multi region setup. We might run millions of test scripts per day. One of our engineers found https://testcontainers.com. We find it interesting and it seems like it won’t maintain container live. Instead, it start and remove the container for each test. We might need to implement lock mechanism to run only maximum number of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Learning TDD by doing: Umbraco & EF Core
    Use a real database. TestContainers works very well. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and Testcontainers, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.