BrowserStack VS Testcontainers
Compare BrowserStack VS Testcontainers and see what are their differences
One directory for employee information across IT, HR, legal, finance and facilities.
featured
BrowserStack
LambdaTest
Selenium
Sauce Labs
browserling
CrossBrowserTesting
Ghost Inspector
Cypress.io
Testcontainers
Arquillian
Cucumber
JUnit
RSpec
TestNG
PHPUnit
Robot framework
BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.
BrowserStack TestcontainersNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Testcontainers should be more popular than BrowserStack. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 1 year ago
For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 1 year ago
I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 1 year ago
In all reality your best bet is probably something like browserstack. Source: over 1 year ago
There's no convenient solution. You may find using browserstack.com is a little easier than maintaining Windows and macOS systems locally. Source: about 2 years ago
You can read more about TestContainers in the official documentation. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
To be able to test for multiple databases, I recommend you using Testcontainers. That's my configuration to start the container:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
I don't get it either. Why not use something like https://testcontainers.com/? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Testing with added infrastructure can be quite tricky. Testcontainers aims to solve this by providing an open-source framework for providing local, lightweight containers for your application that can be immediately thrown away after use. It also has a Rust SDK! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
This is a good start. But DynamoDB Local is a great fit for Testcontainers which "is an open source framework for providing throwaway, lightweight instances of databases, message brokers, web browsers, or just about anything that can run in a Docker container.". - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS
Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.