Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Arquillian VS BrowserStack

Compare Arquillian VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Arquillian logo Arquillian

Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Arquillian Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-02
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

Arquillian

Website
arquillian.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

Arquillian features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    Arquillian allows you to test Java applications across all containers, which includes both embedded and remote setups. This flexibility ensures more comprehensive testing of application components in environments that closely resemble production.
  • Simplifies Container Management
    It simplifies the process of setting up, configuring, and managing the lifecycle of the containers, enabling developers to focus on writing tests instead of container setup.
  • Seamless Integration
    Arquillian integrates well with popular build tools and CI systems such as Maven and Jenkins, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Test Enrichment
    Provides the ability to inject various resources and components directly in your tests, making them cleaner and more focused on verifying behavior rather than configuration.
  • Support for Multiple Frameworks
    It supports a wide range of testing frameworks like JUnit and TestNG, providing flexibility in choosing the framework that fits your project requirements.
  • Active Community
    Being an open-source project with active community support offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums for troubleshooting and getting help.

Possible disadvantages of Arquillian

  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects or microservices, Arquillian's extensive feature set might introduce unnecessary complexity and overhead.
  • Learning Curve
    The framework's powerful capabilities come with a steeper learning curve, particularly for developers who are not already familiar with Java EE or container-based testing.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running tests with Arquillian often requires more resources and time due to the initialization and management of containers, which could slow down the development process.
  • Limited to Java Ecosystem
    Arquillian is primarily focused on Java, which limits its applicability for projects that incorporate other languages or frameworks.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Setting up Arquillian requires additional XML or annotation-based configuration, which can increase the initial setup time compared to simpler testing approaches.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Arquillian videos

+ Add

Testing java microservices using Arquillian (Part 1) - learn Other IT & Software

More videos:

  • Review - Testing java microservices using Arquillian (Part 1) - learn Other IT & Software
  • Review - Testing JSF Applications with Arquillian and Selenium

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Arquillian and BrowserStack)

Arquillian

BrowserStack

Automated Testing
9 9%
Automated Testing
91% 91
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Browser Testing
5 5%
Browser Testing
95% 95

User comments

Share your experience with using Arquillian and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Arquillian and BrowserStack

Arquillian Reviews

We have no reviews of Arquillian yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Arquillian mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Arquillian yet. Tracking of Arquillian recommendations started around Jul 2021.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Arquillian and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Testcontainers - Testcontainers is a modern Java library that comes with the exclusive support of Junit tests.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...