Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BrowserStack VS Blocks.js

Compare BrowserStack VS Blocks.js and see what are their differences

Promptaa
Prompt organization and AI enhancement. Engineer prompts with 1 click. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Blocks.js logo Blocks.js

Deprecated repository. Contribute to Tixit/blocks.js development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • Blocks.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

Blocks.js

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Blocks.js features and specs

  • Modular Design
    Blocks.js allows for modular design construction with reusable and composable components, which enhances maintainability and scalability of projects.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed to be easy to use with a minimalistic approach, making it accessible for developers who want to build and manage DOM elements with less boilerplate.
  • Flexibility
    Blocks.js offers flexibility in building and managing UI components, enabling developers to create highly customized web interfaces without being restricted by typical framework constraints.
  • Efficient Component Updates
    It provides efficient ways to update the DOM, improving performance especially for applications that require frequent updates or changes to the UI.

Possible disadvantages of Blocks.js

  • Limited Popularity and Community Support
    Blocks.js is not as widely used as other UI libraries or frameworks, which might limit community support and resources available for troubleshooting or learning.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The library might not have exhaustive documentation, which can be a barrier for new users trying to learn and implement it properly.
  • Features Compared to Established Frameworks
    Compared to established frameworks like React or Angular, Blocks.js may lack some advanced features or optimizations, which could be crucial for certain complex applications.
  • Potential Integration Challenges
    Integrating Blocks.js with other libraries or existing projects might present challenges, especially if those projects are built with frameworks that have differing paradigms.

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Blocks.js videos

No Blocks.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and Blocks.js)

BrowserStack

Blocks.js

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
JavaScript Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and Blocks.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and Blocks.js

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Blocks.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Blocks.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Blocks.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Blocks.js yet. Tracking of Blocks.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and Blocks.js, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

w2ui - W2UI is a small JavaScript UI library with a complete set of widgets: layout, grid, sidebar, toolbar, tabs, fields, popup, utilities.

Loading...