Breakout List VS Commit Together by Github

• Curated Opportunities
  Breakout List provides a curated selection of high-growth startups, making it easier for job seekers to find promising opportunities.
• Focus on High Growth
  The platform prioritizes companies with the potential for significant growth, attracting candidates interested in joining dynamic and rapidly expanding environments.
• Quality Over Quantity
  Emphasizes quality by featuring a limited number of startups rather than overwhelming users with a large volume of listings.
• Simplified Job Hunting
  Offers a streamlined approach to job hunting by cutting down on the clutter and highlighting standout companies.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Scope
  Focusing only on high-growth startups might exclude stable, established companies, thus limiting the variety of opportunities.
• Subjectivity in Curation
  The selection of companies could be subjective, depending on the judgment and criteria set by the list curators.
• Potential for Bias
  Because the list is curated, there might be inherent biases towards certain industries, leaving others underrepresented.
• Frequent Updates Required
  High-growth startups can rapidly change, which requires regular updates to keep the listings relevant and accurate.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• What sites do y'all use to find Software Engineer work?

  Ya LinkedIn, referrals from friends. For startups, it's a little trickier: use a combo of topstartups.io, breakoutlist.com, curated lists. Source: about 4 years ago

• Where do you go to search for jobs?

  Niche job boards are pretty good if you're already into that niche. But the problem with most of them is that the supply is either limited by who's willing to pay, or anyone can list and it gets very noisy. For startups, prefer... Source: over 4 years ago

• Just found out Stackoverflow has removed their job board (stackoverflow.com/jobs). It was my go to place to search for a new job. Would love to know if anyone here can suggest alternatives other than Linkedin :)

  Yup that’s the one. If you’re looking for startups, try https://topstartups.io and https://breakoutlist.com. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago