Botsify VS Prosody
Compare Botsify VS Prosody and see what are their differences
Sales pipeline software that gets you organized. Helps you focus on the right deals, so easy to use that salespeople just love it. Great for small teams.
featured
Botsify
Chatfuel
Landbot
ChatBot
ManyChat
Collect.chat
Tars
Intercom
Prosody
Apache Vysper
Openfire
Matrix.org
ejabberd SaaS
Rocket.Chat
ejabberd
MongooseIM platform
Botsify ProsodyBased on our record, Prosody seems to be a lot more popular than Botsify. While we know about 15 links to Prosody, we've tracked only 1 mention of Botsify. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Have you ever thought of adding chatbot on your landing page? It certainly leverage up the visual representation of the page. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
There's also the http://prosody.im/ XMPP server that's written in Lua, and it's very successful there. The other major XMPP server implementation is in Erlang and they are equally praised, so that should tell something about Lua's versatility. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Lua on its own right can be fun too! If you are looking for a project to contribute to, there's for instance the Prosody XMPP server that's written in it, and contributes to the betterment of internet by promoting federated protocols. Source: about 1 year ago
You can write largish standalone application in Lua and it is not always a poor choice - Prosody [1] first comes to mind. But qualities which make it a good embedded language make it less _attractive_ for other uses. Lua has very simple syntax and small stdlib which allows its implementation to be very small - you can add Lua to your application and not increase its size significantly. But when the size is not a... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
If you are really set on a LAN-only setup you could look at Prosody (combined with an Android app such as Conversations) which Snikket is based upon. It's not as "ready to go, out of the box" as Snikket and therefore requires a slightly higher skill level, but in exchange it is a lot more customizable and adaptable to different kinds of deployment scenarios. Source: almost 2 years ago
My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Chatfuel - Chatfuel is the best bot platform for creating an AI chatbot on Facebook.
Apache Vysper - Apache Vysper aims to be a modular, full featured XMPP (Jabber) server.
Landbot - An intuitive no-code conversational apps builder that combines the benefits of conversational interface with rich UI elements.
Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.
ChatBot - Easy to use chatbot platform for business
Matrix.org - Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.