BitBucket
GitHub
GitLab
Gitea
SourceForge
Assembla
Phabricator
Launchpad.net
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
PVS-Studio
Parasoft C/C++test
lgtm.com
Polyspace
BitBucket CppcheckBased on our record, BitBucket should be more popular than Cppcheck. It has been mentiond 78 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I am using GitHub for both personal and work projects. In the past, I used BitBucket, and at some point I considered using GitLab, too. However, the popularity of GitHub and its ecosystem made it hard to ignore. I even use GitHub to follow trends in my profession. - Source: dev.to / about 18 hours ago
Facilitated Collaboration and Funding: With easier identification comes better connectivity. Contributors, partners, and funders can more readily find projects that resonate with their interests and values. Moreover, platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket are increasingly interested in integrating standardized licensing solutions like License-Token, paving the way for broader adoption and collaborative... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Git ensures that your code is safe. Even if your laptop crashes, your work is backed up on a remote repository (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket: These platforms provide easy-to-use interfaces for Git, adding features like pull requests, issue tracking, and more. Explore GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Tools: Use platforms like Bitbucket or GitHub’s pull request feature. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: almost 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free