
BetterCloud
Puppet Enterprise
Terraform
Packer
Rancher
Red Hat OpenShift
HHVM
RunDeck
Clearbit
Lusha
DiscoverOrg
Apollo.io
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
BetterCloud
ClearbitBased on our record, Clearbit should be more popular than BetterCloud. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Also for my last employer, I contributed to their private repo by building a web app that can allow People team to orchestrate IT on/off boarding tasks similar to a tool like (BetterCloud) but built in house. Source: almost 4 years ago
It's also called "SaaS management" or "software asset management" e.g. zylo.com bettercloud.com or blissfully.com. Source: over 4 years ago
Many mid-to-large sized organizations use BetterCloud to manage their Google Workspaces. If you use many SaaS products, you can probably manage most of them through their platform. Source: over 4 years ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.
Packer - Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.