Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Beaker browser VS Sidekick Browser

Compare Beaker browser VS Sidekick Browser and see what are their differences

Beaker browser logo Beaker browser

Beaker is a browser for IPFS and Dat.

Sidekick Browser logo Sidekick Browser

The fastest browser for work ever made
  • Beaker browser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Sidekick Browser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24

Sidekick is designed for the ultimate online work experience and brings together every web tool you use. Today, anyone who works in a browser fights to stay organized. Tabs are out of control, browser windows are all over the place, and desktop apps may work on their own, but they donโ€™t integrate well with the rest of your work on the web.

Sidekick changes all of that.

Beaker browser features and specs

  • Decentralized Web
    Beaker Browser is designed to enable users to access and create websites directly from their browser using a decentralized network, providing increased privacy and control over data.
  • Peer-to-Peer Hosting
    It allows users to host websites directly from their own computers, which reduces server costs and scales naturally as more people access the site.
  • Built-in Developer Tools
    Beaker includes powerful developer tools that enable easy creation and sharing of websites, making it accessible for both novice and experienced developers.
  • Innovative Features
    The browser comes with unique features, such as the ability to fork websites and create your own versions, fostering creativity and collaboration.
  • Privacy Focused
    By leveraging decentralized technology, Beaker provides enhanced privacy features, reducing reliance on centralized data collection.

Possible disadvantages of Beaker browser

  • Limited Adoption
    Beaker Browser is not as widely adopted as mainstream browsers, which could limit site compatibility and user community size.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve due to the unfamiliar paradigm of peer-to-peer web hosting and decentralized functionality.
  • Performance Issues
    As a relatively niche project, it may not have the same level of performance optimization as more established browsers.
  • Lack of Extensions
    The browser may not support a wide range of browser extensions like Chrome or Firefox, limiting customization options.
  • Resource Dependency
    Since it's a peer-to-peer network, users may experience performance variability based on the number of peers sharing resources at any time.

Sidekick Browser features and specs

  • Efficiency Tools
    Sidekick Browser provides built-in task management and productivity tools, such as todo lists and tab management features, which can help boost overall efficiency.
  • Performance
    It is optimized for performance by minimizing resource consumption, making it suitable for users who are multitasking or running multiple tabs.
  • Focus Mode
    The focus mode feature helps users stay concentrated on their tasks by blocking out distractions and unnecessary notifications.
  • Security
    Sidekick Browser emphasizes security with features like ad-blockers and Anti-Phishing measures to protect users while they browse.
  • Integration
    It offers seamless integration with various productivity apps and services like Google Workspace, Trello, and Slack, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • User Interface
    The browser has a modern and user-friendly interface that makes navigation intuitive and straightforward.

Possible disadvantages of Sidekick Browser

  • Compatibility
    Some users may experience compatibility issues with certain websites or extensions that are optimized for more widely used browsers like Chrome or Firefox.
  • Learning Curve
    Users accustomed to traditional browsers might face a learning curve when switching to Sidekick Browser due to its unique features and layout.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to other browsers, Sidekick Browser offers fewer options for customization, which might not satisfy users who prefer a highly personalized browsing experience.
  • Resource Usage
    Although optimized for performance, some users have reported that Sidekick Browser can still consume significant system resources, especially with many extensions or tabs open.
  • Subscription Model
    Some advanced features and tools are locked behind a subscription model, which might be a drawback for users looking for a completely free browsing solution.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any browser, there may be concerns regarding data privacy and how user information is handled, which users need to consider.

Analysis of Sidekick Browser

Overall verdict

  • Sidekick Browser is generally considered a good option for users who prioritize efficiency and productivity. Its features cater particularly well to individuals who spend significant time online managing multiple tasks and projects.

Why this product is good

  • Sidekick Browser is designed to enhance productivity by integrating tools like a built-in ad blocker, session manager, and collaboration features, which makes it appealing to users who need to streamline their digital workflows. It is also Chromium-based, providing compatibility with Chrome extensions.

Recommended for

  • Remote workers
  • Project managers
  • Freelancers who juggle multiple clients
  • Tech-savvy users who use numerous web apps
  • Those who appreciate integrated productivity tools

Beaker browser videos

Dat:// And Beaker Browser Review

More videos:

  • Review - Building peer-to-peer apps with the Beaker Browser - Tara Vancil

Sidekick Browser videos

Sidekick browser video presentation

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Beaker browser and Sidekick Browser)
Web Browsers
23 23%
77% 77
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using Beaker browser and Sidekick Browser. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Beaker browser and Sidekick Browser

Beaker browser Reviews

We have no reviews of Beaker browser yet.
Be the first one to post

Sidekick Browser Reviews

  1. Asef Dian
    ยท CEO at Bitslay ยท
    So many bugs to fix

    The idea of a productivity based browser is great but since this browser is still new, it has trouble with a lot of things. Sometimes it doesn't open a new tab when i try, sometimes web apps don't open, and overall its not a smooth experience that i could recommend to people

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Vivaldi, Mozilla Firefox, Brave
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Everything you need is in the homepage|Looks really pretty|Focuses on productivity|Has control over ram usage and data|A search option that searches all throughout your history, bookmarks, web and everything
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    A buggy performance|Short term freezes|Might need some time getting used to the web apps

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Beaker browser should be more popular than Sidekick Browser. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Beaker browser mentions (12)

  • Ask HN: What relatively new project/movement are you excited about?
    Disclosure: It's in Romanian, no cookies, no JS, no trackers Beaker Browser https://beakerbrowser.com/ seems dead, loved the concept but it's no longer updated Now that you've asked, nope, didn't found anything with a clear future on the "Web3" side of the internet. Vast majority make use of crypto/blockchain and IMHO blockchain is anything but not decentralization. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • The Impervious Browser: Your Portal to the P2P Internet
    Just thought I'd jump in with a couple cool projects I have heard of recently that may interest you (i'm not affiliated in any way, just think they are cool): * https://agregore.mauve.moe * https://beakerbrowser.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • The Impervious Browser: Your Portal to the P2P Internet
    Among the P2P browsers, beaker looked pretty good. - https://beakerbrowser.com/ Although their journey has stopped. - https://github.com/beakerbrowser/beaker/discussions/1944. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • List of 3.9k Twitter accounts dropping โ€œ.ethโ€ from usernames
    Would be cool if they were domains and you could use Beaker Browser[0] to view the site. But no, they're essentially a hipster Paypal.me/Revolut.me/Patreon link. [0] https://beakerbrowser.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Mozillaโ€™s Vision for the Evolution of the Web
    > Why not give every user a base URL for their personal site, and serve pages under it directly from the browser running on their computer? Your description reminds me of Beaker, the "peer-to-peer Web browser". https://beakerbrowser.com/ I feel like Mozilla could do more to fund and otherwise support/promote such efforts for re-decentralizing the web, to bring the power balance back to the user. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

Sidekick Browser mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Beaker browser and Sidekick Browser, you can also consider the following products

ZeroNet - ZeroNet. Open, free and uncensorable websites, using Bitcoin cryptography and BitTorrent network. Download for Windows 9. 6MB ยท Unpack ยท Run ZeroNet. exe.

Google Chrome - Google Chrome is a fast, secure, and free web browser, built for the modern web. Give it a try on your desktop today.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

Brave - Fast and secure, ad and tracker blocking browser.

Ghost Browser - Ghost Browser improves your productivity with built in tab management and multi-session browsing so you can log into multiple accounts from one window.

Arc - This new web browser is going to kill Chrome