Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Bazel VS Apache Benchmark

Compare Bazel VS Apache Benchmark and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Bazel logo Bazel

Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.

Apache Benchmark logo Apache Benchmark

ab is a tool for benchmarking your web server.
  • Bazel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-07-17
  • Apache Benchmark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-31

Bazel features and specs

  • High Scalability
    Bazel is designed to handle large codebases and complex dependency graphs efficiently, which makes it suitable for projects with millions of lines of code.
  • Incremental Builds
    Bazel supports incremental builds by only rebuilding parts of the project that have changed, thus saving time and computational resources.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Bazel supports different platforms including Linux, MacOS, and Windows, enabling consistent build processes across diverse development environments.
  • Reproducible Builds
    It ensures that the same source code will yield identical build outputs, which is beneficial for debugging and ensuring consistency across different environments.
  • Extensibility
    Bazel is highly extensible, allowing developers to define custom build rules and macros to fit their specific needs.
  • Wide Language Support
    Out of the box, Bazel supports many programming languages such as Java, C++, Python, and Go, with the ability to extend to other languages.

Possible disadvantages of Bazel

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Bazel has a complex configuration language and many internal concepts, which might be challenging for new users to learn and adopt quickly.
  • Limited IDE Integration
    Compared to other build systems, Bazel might have limited or less mature support in certain Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), potentially hindering productivity.
  • Overhead of Remote Caching
    While remote caching is a powerful feature, setting it up and maintaining it can introduce additional overhead and complexity to the build process.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Getting a project up and running with Bazel can require significant upfront configuration, especially for projects migrating from another build system.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more established build systems, Bazel has a smaller community, which might result in fewer resources and shared knowledge available online.

Apache Benchmark features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Apache Benchmark is straightforward to use with a simple command-line interface, allowing users to quickly conduct basic load testing on web servers without a steep learning curve.
  • Speed
    Because it is a command-line tool, Apache Benchmark executes quickly and can generate a significant amount of traffic with minimal system resource usage.
  • Wide Availability
    As part of the Apache HTTP Server project, it is widely available on most Unix-based systems and easy to install on others, making it accessible for most developers.
  • Open Source
    Apache Benchmark is open-source software, providing full access to the source code for customization and ensuring there are no costs associated with its usage.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Benchmark

  • Limited Features
    Apache Benchmark is quite limited in its capabilities, providing only basic performance metrics and lacking features such as detailed reporting, analysis, and support for different types of HTTP requests.
  • No GUI
    It doesn’t come with a graphical user interface, which could be a barrier for users who prefer visual representations and more interactive usage.
  • Single URL Testing
    The tool is only capable of testing one URL at a time, which can be a limitation when assessing the performance of more complex, multi-page applications.
  • Limited to HTTP
    Apache Benchmark only supports HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which can be restrictive for testing applications using other protocols.
  • Limited Scalability
    Due to its basic nature, it might not handle very large-scale load testing efficiently and may require additional tools or setups to simulate more extensive server loads.

Analysis of Bazel

Overall verdict

  • Bazel is a powerful and robust build tool, especially for large-scale projects and organizations that require high build performance and scalability. Its advanced features can significantly improve the efficiency of development workflows. However, there is a learning curve, and the complexity of rules and configurations may not suit smaller projects or those with simpler build requirements.

Why this product is good

  • Bazel is a build tool developed by Google that is designed to support fast and correct builds. It is particularly known for its ability to handle large codebases and complex build dependencies efficiently. Bazel uses a single build language across different platforms, and its build system provides features such as incremental builds, remote build execution, and caching, which make it highly suitable for repetitive and reproducible builds. The tool is capable of handling projects written in multiple languages, such as Java, C++, Python, and more, due to its extensibility with custom rules.

Recommended for

  • Large-scale and complex software projects
  • Organizations that utilize monorepos
  • Developers needing cross-platform support
  • Teams looking to leverage remote build execution
  • Projects with complex dependencies across multiple programming languages

Bazel videos

+ Add

Kebenaran dari Powerbank Bazel 450 Series

More videos:

  • Review - BazelCon 2019 Day 2: Half-Day Bazel Bootcamp (Part 1)
  • Review - What's new in Bazel build and Gerrit Code Review

Apache Benchmark videos

+ Add

Apache Benchmarking using AB in linux

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bazel and Apache Benchmark)

Bazel

Apache Benchmark

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
JavaScript Package Manager
100 100%
JavaScript Package Manager
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bazel and Apache Benchmark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bazel seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 67 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bazel mentions (67)

  • Swift and Cute 2D Game Framework: Setting Up a Project with CMake
    I really recommend Bazel (https://bazel.build). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Why Is This Site Built with C
    Agree regarding easiness of building rust (`cargo build`), extremely satisfying (git clone and cargo build...) Does anyone have any comments on Bazel[1] because I'm kind of settling on using it whenever it's appropriate (c/c++)?.. [1] https://bazel.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • 7 Ways to Use the SLSA Framework to Secure the SDLC
    To achieve reproducibility, your build process must control for environmental differences like timestamps, file ordering, or machine-specific configurations. Tools like Bazel or Nixprovide deterministic build systems that lock down these variables. For instance, Bazel uses a content-addressable cache, meaning the same source code and dependencies always result in the same build outputs, even when run on different... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Contributing To Open Source - C++ Edition
    Despite following all the steps (on both Windows and Unix), I couldn't get the cmake build to succeed. After several hours of debugging, I decided to try another build method provided by the project, using bazel, which was much simpler. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • How to effectively work in big codebases
    Many big companies have built their own tools to reign in this complexity and make it easier and faster for developers to work on large, multi-language code bases. Meta has buck, Amazon has brazil, and Google has bazel. But from my experience, especially, with brazil, these tools also have some rough edges, so understanding how they work can go a long way. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Apache Benchmark mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Benchmark yet. Tracking of Apache Benchmark recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bazel and Apache Benchmark, you can also consider the following products

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

LoadComplete - The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

Loading...