Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LoadComplete VS Apache Benchmark

Compare LoadComplete VS Apache Benchmark and see what are their differences

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

Apache Benchmark logo Apache Benchmark

ab is a tool for benchmarking your web server.
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01
  • Apache Benchmark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-31

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

Apache Benchmark features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Apache Benchmark is straightforward to use with a simple command-line interface, allowing users to quickly conduct basic load testing on web servers without a steep learning curve.
  • Speed
    Because it is a command-line tool, Apache Benchmark executes quickly and can generate a significant amount of traffic with minimal system resource usage.
  • Wide Availability
    As part of the Apache HTTP Server project, it is widely available on most Unix-based systems and easy to install on others, making it accessible for most developers.
  • Open Source
    Apache Benchmark is open-source software, providing full access to the source code for customization and ensuring there are no costs associated with its usage.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Benchmark

  • Limited Features
    Apache Benchmark is quite limited in its capabilities, providing only basic performance metrics and lacking features such as detailed reporting, analysis, and support for different types of HTTP requests.
  • No GUI
    It doesn’t come with a graphical user interface, which could be a barrier for users who prefer visual representations and more interactive usage.
  • Single URL Testing
    The tool is only capable of testing one URL at a time, which can be a limitation when assessing the performance of more complex, multi-page applications.
  • Limited to HTTP
    Apache Benchmark only supports HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which can be restrictive for testing applications using other protocols.
  • Limited Scalability
    Due to its basic nature, it might not handle very large-scale load testing efficiently and may require additional tools or setups to simulate more extensive server loads.

LoadComplete videos

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

Apache Benchmark videos

Apache Benchmarking using AB in linux

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LoadComplete and Apache Benchmark)
Monitoring Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Website Testing
59 59%
41% 41
Development
76 76%
24% 24
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LoadComplete and Apache Benchmark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LoadComplete seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: almost 4 years ago

Apache Benchmark mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Benchmark yet. Tracking of Apache Benchmark recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LoadComplete and Apache Benchmark, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

LoadView - LoadView is a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to stress-test their websites and web apps to know their performance level.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service