
fd
fzf
Starship (Shell Prompt)
lazygit
tmux
fish shell
Micro
A cat(1) clone with wings.

Refactor.io
Figstack
PullRequest.com
GitLive
Azure DevOps
codebeat
Promyze
CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Bat seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 121 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | codestream.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Bat yet.
CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Developers, system administrators, and technical users who work with code or configuration files and need an enhanced command-line tool that offers syntax highlighting and other advanced features. It is especially recommended for those using Git, as Bat provides seamless integration with Git repositories, displaying file changes and annotations effectively.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Development teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
$30 WOOD BAT vs $150 WOOD BAT - Louisville Slugger Wood Bat Reviews - Bat Bros in VEGAS
More videos
CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Bat and CodeStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Bat yet. Be the first one to post
After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


But for reading code, scripts, configs, Markdown, YAML, JSON, or anything where your eyes are expected to survive the experience, bat is much nicer. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Bat does not look like a pager: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat?tab=readme-ov-file#automatic-paging. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Bat is the king of pagers. https://github.com/sharkdp/bat. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Tracking CodeStream since Mar 2021.
When comparing Bat and CodeStream, you can also consider the following products.


Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review
Compare Refactor.io to Bat or CodeStream:



Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.
Compare Starship (Shell Prompt) to Bat or CodeStream:
