Basin VS cppq

• Custom Redirects
  Redirect users to any URL after successful form submission.
• File Uploads
  Allow visitors to upload files and attachments directly through your forms.
• Projects / Workspaces
  Organize forms and submissions into projects for easier management.
• Form Sharing
  Share forms with teammates or collaborators for review and management.
• Webhooks
  Send form submissions instantly to external services and APIs.
• Custom Templates
  Create reusable templates to quickly deploy new forms.
• Custom Domains
  Send emails from your own domain for a seamless branded experience.
• API Access
  Access submissions and manage forms programmatically via Basin’s API.
• Advanced Spam Protection
  Automatically detect and block spam submissions using multiple filtering techniques.
• Integrations
  Connect Basin with tools like Zapier, Slack, Google Sheets, and more.
• CSV Data Exporting
  Export form submissions to CSV for reporting, backups, or analysis.
• Domain Restrictions
  Limit which websites can submit data to your forms.
• Autoresponder Emails
  Automatically send confirmation or follow-up emails to users after submission.
• Partial Form Submission Capture
  Capture leads even if users abandon the form before completing it.
• Submission Analytics
  Track form activity and performance through built-in analytics.
• Team Collaboration
  Invite teammates and manage access to projects and submissions.
• Email Notifications
  Receive instant email alerts whenever a new form submission is received.
• Custom Success Messages
  Display personalized confirmation messages after submissions.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Send emails from an HTML Contact Form in 2 minutes

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• How to add a contact form to an Astro site without a backend

  There are plenty: Formspree, Basin, Formcarry, Web3Forms, Netlify Forms if you're on Netlify. I build CatchForm, so that's what the code below uses — the shape is the same whichever you pick. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• RudderStack's Data Stack: Deep Dive

  Another tool we use on the marketing site is Basin, which acts as a back-end form submission handler that isn't susceptible to client-side browser blockers or JavaScript errors, meaning we capture leads no matter what. Basin routes data... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

• What do you usually do when you need a fast and simple way to capture some simple data? I have a static website with a signup form, and using a database just to save some emails would be an overkill.

  I just use Basin https://usebasin.com. Source: about 5 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.