Software Alternatives & Startups

Bashtop VS OutageDeck

Compare Bashtop VS OutageDeck and see what are their differences

Bashtop

Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor

Rating
0 reviews
OutageDeck

Check the cloud and SaaS vendors your product depends on without opening every status page. Official-source timelines, observed uptime history, and alerts to email, Slack, Teams, Discord, or webhooks. Five-provider email alerts are free.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $19 / Monthly (Starter)

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Bashtop seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 22 times since March 2021.

social mentions
22 vs 0
Monitoring Tools popularity
78% vs 22%
alternatives listed
110 vs 20

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Bashtop
OutageDeck
Website github.com outagedeck.com
Pricing
Freemium $19 / Monthly (Starter) Official pricing
Platforms
Web
Company Startup from Egypt · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About Bashtop and OutageDeck

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Bashtop
OutageDeck

No description of Bashtop yet.

I built OutageDeck because I got tired of opening a dozen status pages whenever something broke, trying to work out whether the problem was mine or somebody else's. OutageDeck reads the official machine-readable status feeds cloud and SaaS vendors publish about themselves. It normalizes current...

Read more about OutageDeck

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Bashtop 4 features
OutageDeck 6 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Bashtop features an intuitive and visually appealing user interface that makes it easy to monitor system resources like CPU, memory, and processes in real-time.
  • Feature-Rich
    The tool offers a wide range of functionalities including process management, detailed stats on system performance, and customizable options, making it versatile for various needs.
  • Ease of Installation
    Installing Bashtop is straightforward on most Linux distributions, as well as macOS and even Windows via WSL, with clear instructions provided in the documentation.
  • Low Resource Usage
    Despite its graphical interface, Bashtop is relatively lightweight and does not consume a significant amount of system resources, which is ideal for maintaining system performance while monitoring.

Possible disadvantages

  • Bash Dependency
    Being a bash script, Bashtop requires GNU Bash shell to run, which might not be as efficient as applications written in compiled languages for high-performance monitoring tasks.
  • Compatibility Limitations
    While Bashtop runs on various systems, there are occasional compatibility issues or platform-specific bugs that can affect its performance or usability.
  • No Longer Maintained
    Development of Bashtop has been discontinued in favor of Bpytop, a Python-based version, which means users may not receive updates or support for newer systems and bugs.
  • Terminal Based
    Since it runs in the terminal, users who prefer or require graphical user interfaces for system monitoring might find Bashtop less convenient compared to other available GUI-based system monitors.
  • Providers tracked
    Cloud and SaaS vendors with official machine-readable status feeds
  • Alert channels
    Slack, Teams, Discord, email and webhooks, with a test-fire button
  • Developer API
    JSON API (OpenAPI 3.1), RSS feeds, embeddable SVG status badges
  • Data Sources
    Official machine-readable vendor sources only. No crowd reports or synthetic probes
  • Uptime History
    Observed uptime history from archived vendor-published status, with partial and regional impact split
  • Free Tier
    Email alerts for 5 providers, no card required

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Bashtop
OutageDeck

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Bashtop is considered good by many users due to its comprehensive feature set and ease of use. It offers detailed information and a clean interface, enhancing the user experience significantly. It receives positive feedback for its performance and adaptability.

Why this product is good

  • Bashtop is a resource monitor that provides a visually appealing interface and real-time insights into system performance. It is user-friendly, highly customizable, and supports multiple platforms, making it a popular choice for users who want to monitor CPU, memory, disk usage, and network activities closely. Bashtop also allows for a quick glance at running processes, making it accessible for users who appreciate efficiency and an intuitive layout.

Recommended for

    Bashtop is recommended for system administrators, developers, and tech-savvy users who need to monitor system performance regularly. It's also suitable for users who appreciate visually engaging terminal applications and those accustomed to working with command-line tools.

No analysis of OutageDeck yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Bashtop 2 videos + Add
OutageDeck 0 videos + Add

Bashtop Is An Htop Alternative Written In Bash

More videos

  • - Top Guides - Bashtop Themeable CLI System Monitor

No OutageDeck videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Bashtop
OutageDeck
78% 78%
22% 22%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Bashtop and OutageDeck.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

OutageDeck's answer:

  • Frontend / app: Next.js 16 (App Router), React 19, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS
  • Data: Supabase Postgres. Every upstream feed is validated with Zod, so provider format drift fails loudly instead of corrupting data
  • Ingestion: each vendor's official feed polled every 10 minutes, with per-provider failure isolation, so one broken feed never blocks the rest
  • Alerting: a delivery ledger with exactly-once claims, so overlapping runs never double-page anyone

What's the story behind your product?

OutageDeck's answer:

I got tired of opening a dozen vendor status pages during every incident, just to work out whether the problem was mine or somebody else's. So I built the thing I wanted.

It launched in July 2026 as one live board over the official status feeds of cloud and SaaS vendors teams depend on. The catalog changes as official sources are added or removed.

The rule from day one: official machine-readable sources only. No crowd reports, no scraping. If a status can't be traced back to the vendor's own feed, it doesn't get published.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

OutageDeck's answer:

Anyone whose incident channel regularly starts with "is AWS down, or is it just us?":

  • DevOps, SRE, and platform engineers. Answer "is it us or them?" in seconds during an incident.
  • Small SaaS teams. Your uptime depends on other people's clouds, so see whether a vendor has acknowledged a problem before changing your own stack.
  • Agencies and MSPs. Watch the vendor stacks of many clients from one place.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

OutageDeck's answer:

Choose it when your problem is third-party vendor status, not when you need synthetic monitoring of your own application.

  • Fast triage. One stack view normalizes current status, affected services, source timestamps, and incident history across the cloud and SaaS vendors your product depends on. You can use it without an account.
  • Traceable, limited claims. Every record links to the vendor's official source. Providers can acknowledge incidents late, so OutageDeck should be a second signal beside direct provider checks and probes from your own regions. Its own health endpoint is checked from a separate GitHub-hosted workflow with public run history.
  • Useful exits. Free accounts add email alerts for five providers. Paid plans add Slack, Teams, Discord, webhooks, and private Statuspage or Instatus feeds. Developers can use the keyless JSON API, RSS, badges, CLI, MCP server, GitHub Action, or Open WebUI tool.

What makes your product unique?

OutageDeck's answer:

OutageDeck only reports what vendors officially publish. Every status comes from the provider's own machine-readable feed, never crowd reports and never scraping. Then it holds vendors to what they said:

  • Observed uptime history from archived vendor-published status, with honest partial and regional impact framing
  • Every incident links back to its source on the vendor's own status page
  • One dashboard for the cloud and SaaS vendors your product depends on, with alerts to Slack, Teams, Discord, email, or webhooks
  • Bring your own feed on paid plans: point it at any Statuspage or Instatus page it does not track yet
  • A JSON API, RSS feeds, README badges, and an MCP server so a coding agent can check the vendor before it blames your code

User comments

Share your experience with using Bashtop and OutageDeck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Bashtop 22 mentions
OutageDeck 0 mentions
  • BPYTOP - a fun HTOP alternative :-)
    Check out btop. It’s a rewrite of bpytop in C++. Both are from the same author. FYI, bpytop is also a rewrite of bashtop in python. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Btop looks great
    As far as I remember, the guy made first the bashtop, that was slow as molasses but looks cool. Then he made bpytop that is the same idea but ported to python, and then finally ported to C++ and we got just btop. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Share your greatest free tools
    Bashtop - Seriously, I my brain can't follow columns without some kind of order to the madness. Ty bashtop. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking OutageDeck since Jul 2026.

Alternatives to Bashtop and OutageDeck

When comparing Bashtop and OutageDeck, you can also consider the following products.