
Lovable
bolt.new
replit
Bubble.io
Softr
Cursor
Taskade
The platform for people to turn ideas into working products.

Planner 5D
RoomSketcher
Floorplanner
FloorPlanCreator.ai
Visual Floor Planner
FloorSketch
SketchUp
Workflow software for interior designers: plan, lay out, source, render and present a room in one tool — every piece a real product that fits the space.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, BASE44 seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | base44.com | decato.ai |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of BASE44 yet.
Most interior tools stop at a picture. You arrange a room, it looks right, and then you are on your own to find out what that sofa is, whether it is in stock, what it costs and whether it fits through the door. Decato works the other way round. The floor plan comes first, so the room is a set of...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Decato yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing BASE44 and Decato.
Decato's answer:
It starts from the floor plan rather than from a photo or a prompt. The room exists as wall lengths, door swings and clearances before it is ever an image, so every piece is checked against those numbers and anything that will not clear a walkway or a door is dropped before you see it.
What comes back is a specification of real, in-stock products with prices and dimensions, plus a render assembled from those exact items rather than from invented furniture. Most tools in this category end at a picture and leave the sourcing to you; Decato ends at the list you can order from.
Decato's answer:
Because of what you are holding when it finishes.
AI render tools give you an image. You still have to work out what the sofa is, whether it is in stock, what it costs and whether it fits through the door. Traditional planners give you a drawing, and the sourcing is still yours to do. Decato returns the drawing, the products, the fit checks and the client deck in one pass, and every row in the specification links back to the product page.
It is also worth knowing where it does not compete. It is a Mac app; there is no mobile version and Windows is not out yet. Planning is unlimited and free on your own ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini subscription, so you only pay when you want sourcing and photoreal renders.
Decato's answer:
Two groups, doing the same job at different scales.
Interior designers furnishing real client projects. They work to a plan, a budget and a deadline, and what they have to hand over is not a mood board but a specification a client can order from. They are the reason the fit checks and the exported deck exist.
And people furnishing their own flat who have measurements to work from — a room they have just moved into, a renovation, a rental they want to plan before buying anything. Same problem, one room at a time, and usually the first time anyone has told them a 209 cm bed takes almost a third of a 10 square metre bedroom.
Both are on macOS, since that is the only platform Decato ships on today.
Decato's answer:
Decato is a second attempt. The first product was a different Mac app that ran for two years and was stopped for lack of traction — the lesson being that a tool has to finish a job someone is already doing badly, rather than add a step to it.
So this one started with about two dozen conversations with working interior designers. The complaint was consistent, and it was not about renders: making the picture is the easy part now. The hours go into what comes after — identifying every item in it, checking it is still in stock, pricing it, and finding out that the wardrobe you drew does not clear the bedroom door.
Decato was built to end at that point instead of starting there. The floor plan comes first, the geometry is real, and the last thing it produces is a priced list rather than an image. It is early: the Mac app is out, Windows is planned, and there is a lot still to build.
Decato's answer:
Share your experience with using BASE44 and Decato. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The first category includes tools like Lovable or Base44. These are prompt-driven tools that can generate visually polished interfaces very quickly. They're great for demos that need to look impressive. However, they are usually... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I love how AI is shaking up coding, and vibe coding seems to be the new obsession of -almost- every developer. It lets anyone, even non-coders, build apps by describing ideas in plain English. Tools like Base44, Lovable, and Cursor turn... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Landing page is excellent, esp the video; gets straight to the point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFzQF_Ik_-g https://base44.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Tracking Decato since Aug 2026.
When comparing BASE44 and Decato, you can also consider the following products.


Home Design Software & Interior Design Tool ONLINE for home & floor plans in 2D & 3D. Read more about Planner 5D.
Compare Planner 5D to BASE44 or Decato:



Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.
Compare replit to BASE44 or Decato:

Floor plan interior design software. Design your house, home, room, apartment, kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, office or classroom online for free or sell real estate better with interactive 2D and 3D floorplans.
Compare Floorplanner to BASE44 or Decato: