
Google App Engine
Salesforce Platform
Dokku
Google Cloud Functions
AWS Lambda
Now Platform
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Create and deploy mission critical Web apps that scale with your business

Keygen
The simplest way to license your app.
Which is more popular?
Azure Web Apps might be a bit more popular than Keylight.dev. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 4 links to Keylight.dev.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | azure.microsoft.com | keylight.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Belgium · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Azure Web Apps yet.
Keylight sits between your payment provider and your app. Licenses, activations, customers, and usage all live here. Switch providers, or run several, without shipping a new build.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Comparing Azure Web Apps, VMs and Cloud Services
No Keylight.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Azure Web Apps and Keylight.dev.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight keeps app licensing separate from payments. You can use Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Gumroad, or your own checkout without tying your app to one provider.
It handles license keys, device activations, trials, free tiers, offline access, grace periods, and signed license state through one SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
My goal is to make all apps work with Keylight. So all of your licenses, from any types of apps, is going through Keylight for analytics, customer portal, support, ...
Most licensing tools are bundled into a payment provider. Keylight is built as an independent licensing layer.
That means you can change payment providers, sell through multiple platforms, or change your pricing model without rebuilding licensing inside your app.
It also gives developers a ready-made SDK and dashboard instead of requiring them to build and maintain their own licensing backend.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight is primarily built for independent developers and software companies selling apps directly to customers.
Its main audience includes:
macOS and iOS developers Web app and SaaS developers Developers selling outside app stores Teams migrating from a payment provider’s built-in licensing Developers who need trials, device limits, offline access, and license analytics
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight started because I kept rebuilding the same licensing systems for different apps: license keys, trials, activations, offline access, device changes, and all the edge cases that come with them.
I also did not want licensing to be controlled by whichever payment provider an app happened to use.
So I built Keylight as a standalone layer between the app and the payment provider. Payment platforms send events to Keylight, and the app receives one consistent license state through the SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
That's confidential.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Swift and Swift Package Manager for the Apple SDK Rust SDK / JS SDK / C# SDK / C++ SDK TypeScript React Next.js Stripe Connect and payment-provider webhooks Cryptographic signatures for secure, offline-capable licenses REST APIs for application and provider integrations
Share your experience with using Azure Web Apps and Keylight.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Azure Web Apps yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Do we even need to set up TLS if our back and front end are hosted on services like https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/app-service/web/ or other web hosting platforms? Source: almost 5 years ago
Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/app-service/web/ Https://cloud.google.com/appengine. Source: about 5 years ago
The solution runs on as a single Azure Web App, it uses a background WebJob to collect all the data needed to present in the web dashboard. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
You don't want to hand-roll Ed25519 and lease parsing. Most licensing SDKs hide this behind a couple of calls. With Keylight, for example, the offline path collapses to: activate once, then a local checkOnLaunch() that verifies the lease... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full disclosure: I now build Keylight, so weigh this accordingly — I'm telling you the seam it's designed for, not that it wins every row. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full docs and the free tier are at keylight.dev. If you're on Tauri or Electron instead of native Swift, the same SDK pattern exists in JS/Rust. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
When comparing Azure Web Apps and Keylight.dev, you can also consider the following products.

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.
Compare Google App Engine to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev:

A dead-simple software licensing API built for developers
Compare Keygen to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev:

Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.
Compare Salesforce Platform to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev:

Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash
Compare Dokku to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev:

A serverless platform for building event-based microservices.
Compare Google Cloud Functions to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev:

Automatic, event-driven compute service
Compare AWS Lambda to Azure Web Apps or Keylight.dev: