
i3
Openbox
dwm
Fluxbox
Xmonad
bspwm
Hyprland
A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code.org seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 385 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | awesome.naquadah.org | code.org |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | 2012 |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Surface Go Review - It’s Awesome
More videos
Programming For Kids: Scratch vs Code.org
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using awesome and Code.org. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Awesome is a free & open-source next-generation tiling manager for X that is designed to be fast and adaptable, with a focus on developers, power users, and anyone who wants to have more control over their graphical...
awesome is a free and open-source next-generation tiling manager for X built to be fast and extensible and it is primarily aimed at developers, power users, and anyone who would like to control their graphical...
Awesome has a unique take on the concept of a tiling window manager. It is probably the most user-friendly on the list. Much like i3, it claims to have well-documented code to make it very easy to dig right into for...
Code.org is an online marketplace that can empower students, specifically students, to get detailed knowledge regarding the principles of the computer sciences. This platform can let its users access the free coding...
Nevertheless, the platform has the stats to prove its dependability. More than 67 million people use Code.org, including over two million teachers. In addition, the platform records over 208 million projects so far.
Code.org is much easier to use than Thunkable.First of all names say everything.Second,it has more modes than just "drag-and-drop".
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking awesome since Mar 2021.
Code.org uses an extremely outdated version of javascript, It's so hard to access data in array, im basically forced to do this. Cant wait to ditch this shit. Source: almost 3 years ago
I'm not sure if your 4.5yo is old enough to try Scratch[1] but nothing is too young these days. My elder got into Scratch around that time. These days, my younger one is into https://code.org and she make things go around, do stuffs,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
So I am using code.org to make a platforming game, and if I am halfway off of a platform I slide off of it. Idk if this is a quirk with code.org or if I did something wrong. You can check the hitboxes by pressing debug sprites in the... Source: almost 3 years ago
When comparing awesome and Code.org, you can also consider the following products.

A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.
Compare i3 to awesome or Code.org:

Scratch is the programming language & online community where young people create stories, games, & animations.
Compare Scratch to awesome or Code.org:
Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.
Compare Openbox to awesome or Code.org:

Learn the technical skills you need for the job you want. As leaders in online education and learning to code, we’ve taught over 45 million people using a tested curriculum and an interactive learning environment.
Compare Codecademy to awesome or Code.org:

dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.
Compare dwm to awesome or Code.org:
