Avidemux Reviews

Simple.css Framework Reviews

Avidemux mentions (8)

• What You Need to Know Before Touching a Video File

  Remux vs reencode itself is a big point for video noobs such as myself. In the past, cropping out a part of a video would meant reencoding it in some random preset. This would often take longer than required. however, accidentally realized the difference when trying out avidemux [1] and clipping together videos blazing fast (provided in same container and format)! [1] http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Make Timelapse easily using FFmpeg

  There are a lot of free apps to make lightweight edits to videos on windows. One example is Avidemux. I have high-end video editors but Avidemux comes in handy more often than it should. http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• GUI Video Editing For Linux?

  Avidemux is cross-platform and pretty easy to use, without too much of a learning curve. You can set both audio and video to copy when you just want to convert formats with losing quality. For adding a text or a watermark you'd use the "Add logo" filter and maybe tweak down the alpha setting to make it semi-transparent. However you can't do fancy tricks like make the text move across the screen or anything like... Source: over 3 years ago

• DaVinci Resolve Speed Editor for Avidemux?

  I just stumbled upon the Blackmagic Design DaVinci Resolve Speed Editor and was wondering if someone could tell me whether it would be compatible with Avidemux, which I'm currently using to quickly edit some VHS rips. There's a potential that the Speed Editor would save me a lot of button presses on the keyboard, since I do all the editing on the keyboard in Avidemix. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Remember Windows Movie Maker back on windows XP? What's the equivalent on the Manjaro KDE repos?

  I am using AviDemux (official repo) but doing very simple tasks. Http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/. Source: almost 4 years ago

Simple.css Framework mentions (4)

• Why Tailwind Won (And What That Means for Traditional CSS) 🐍

  Plain CSS or a minimal framework like Pico or Simple.css will serve you better. Don't introduce complexity you don't need. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• 10 Amazing Classless CSS Frameworks to Check Out

  Website: Website GitHub Repo: GitHub Repo. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Show HN: HTML for People

  > The decision to skip CSS by depending on https://simplecss.org/ is smart I was always a little disappointed with how most web browsers choose to render HTML pages that had no explicit styling information. I'm not necessarily saying web browsers should have defaults as opinionated as simple.css, but the default page margins, padding, text styles, headings, etc that they picked aren't particularly attractive.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Show HN: HTML for People

  This is great. The decision to skip CSS by depending on https://simplecss.org/ is smart - CSS is a whole other thing, and having that on top of basic HTML would be pretty intimidating. I did worry a bit about https://htmlforpeople.com/zero-to-internet-your-first-website/ - "Step 1. Create a folder on your computer" - because apparently a large number of people these days don't understand files and folders at all!... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago