
FlyingPress
WP-Optimize
WP Fastest Cache
Cachify
WP Super Cache
Hyper Cache
W3 Total Cache
Autoptimize makes optimizing your site really easy.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Squoosh seems to be a lot more popular than Autoptimize. While we know about 203 links to Squoosh, we've tracked only 1 mention of Autoptimize.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | autoptimize.com | squoosh.app |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Autoptimize yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Web developers, designers, bloggers, and anyone needing to optimize images for the web, particularly those concerned about maintaining image quality while reducing file size.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Autoptimize WordPress Plugin 2020 Review, Tutorial, Best Settings, and Error Solutions
More videos
Jumbo Squoosh-o’s Review! #SLIMESTAGRAM #JumboSquooshos
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Autoptimize and Squoosh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Autoptimize yet. Be the first one to post
The only negative thing about this web app, is that it's not clear which formats are supported in which browsers.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The issues your site are having are troublesome for most small site administrators: good score on Desktop load but lousy on Mobile load. There are also good paid options for someone to professionally optimize the site using the above... Source: almost 5 years ago
Use Squoosh for an interactive local comparison, your CMS's image pipeline, or a hosted tool such as TinyImage. Choose the processing model that fits the image and your workflow. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
WebP/AVIF over PNG/JPG: Converted all icons to WebP (using Squoosh) – average size reduction of ~60% (e.g., a 40KB PNG icon became 15KB WebP). - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
It often comes down to compat, and developer requests. Personally I find in-browser encoding for images inadequate, because it doesn't expose enough options. When we built https://squoosh.app/, we exposed the browser encoders for... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
When comparing Autoptimize and Squoosh, you can also consider the following products.

FlyingPress is a lightweight and easy to use speed optimization plugin for WordPress.
Compare FlyingPress to Autoptimize or Squoosh:

Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!
Compare TinyPNG to Autoptimize or Squoosh:

All-in-one WordPress plugin that does database cleaning, image compression, and site caching.
Compare WP-Optimize to Autoptimize or Squoosh:

iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.
Compare iLoveIMG to Autoptimize or Squoosh:
The fastest and easiest wordpress cache plugin.
Compare WP Fastest Cache to Autoptimize or Squoosh:

Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.
Compare Caesium Image Compressor to Autoptimize or Squoosh: