Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
A

Automake VS EBuild

Compare Automake VS EBuild and see what are their differences

Project Burndown
Burndown is project management, automated. Our smart scheduling technology constantly manages your team's schedule - based on your priorities, progress, and capacity - so you don’t have to. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Automake logo Automake

GNU Automake is a programming tool that produces portable makefiles for use by the make program...

EBuild logo EBuild

EBuild is a software project build, dependency management and reporting technology.
  • Automake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-25
  • EBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-22

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Automake and EBuild)

Automake

EBuild

Front End Package Manager
61 61%
Front End Package Manager
39% 39
Continuous Integration
39 39%
Continuous Integration
61% 61
JavaScript Package Manager
64 64%
JavaScript Package Manager
36% 36
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Automake and EBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Automake and EBuild, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

waf - Waf is a Python-based framework for configuring, compiling and installing applications.

Autoconf - GNU Autoconf is a tool for producing configure scripts for building, installing and packaging...

Loading...