Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Atril VS Mindmapper

Compare Atril VS Mindmapper and see what are their differences

Topolog
Topolog is a goal planner that models your plans as a directed graph and allows you to execute tasks in order, then schedules your days around them. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Atril logo Atril

Atril is a simple multi-page document viewer. Atril is a fork of Evince.

Mindmapper logo Mindmapper

Be more creative and get more done. Process your thoughts with a mind map and implement with a planner.
  • Atril Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Mindmapper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07

Atril features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Atril is designed to be a lightweight document viewer, making it fast and efficient with system resources. This is particularly beneficial for older or less powerful computers.
  • MATE Integration
    As part of the MATE desktop environment, Atril is well-integrated and maintains a consistent look and feel with other MATE applications, providing a seamless user experience.
  • Multiple Format Support
    Atril supports a variety of document formats, including PDF, PostScript, DjVu, DVI, and XPS, making it a versatile tool for viewing different kinds of documents.
  • Open Source
    Atril is open-source software, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and distribute the software. This fosters transparency and community contributions.

Possible disadvantages of Atril

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some other document viewers, Atril may have fewer advanced features, such as extensive annotation tools or advanced search capabilities.
  • MATE Dependency
    While Atril can be used outside the MATE desktop environment, it is specifically designed for MATE, meaning it may not integrate as well with other desktop environments.
  • Occasional Lag with Large Files
    Users may experience some performance lag when opening very large documents, which can affect usability.
  • Development Pace
    Being part of a community-driven project, Atril's development and updates can be slower compared to commercial software with dedicated development teams.

Mindmapper features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    MindMapper offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for users of all levels, allowing them to quickly create and organize mind maps without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It integrates well with other tools and platforms, enabling seamless data and workflow management across different applications which boosts productivity.
  • Versatile Features
    MindMapper provides a rich set of features including brainstorming, scheduling, and resource management tools, making it a versatile choice for various tasks beyond simple mind mapping.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    The software is available on multiple platforms, including Windows and mobile devices, offering flexibility for users to work from various devices.
  • Customizable Templates
    A wide array of templates are available, allowing users to select designs that best fit their project needs, which can save time and enhance creativity.

Possible disadvantages of Mindmapper

  • Cost
    MindMapper can be considered expensive compared to some other mind mapping tools, particularly for individual users or small teams on a tight budget.
  • Limited Mac Support
    Currently, there is no native version for Mac users, which might limit its adoption among teams or individuals who rely on Apple devices.
  • Complexity for Basic Users
    While feature-rich, it might appear overwhelming to users who only need basic mind mapping functionalities or prefer minimalistic design.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance issues, particularly when handling very large or complex mind maps, which can disrupt workflow efficiency.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the basic features are easy to understand, mastering the more advanced aspects of MindMapper can require a significant time investment.

Analysis of Atril

Overall verdict

  • Atril is considered a good option for users looking for a straightforward, reliable document viewer integrated with the MATE desktop environment. It offers essential features required for everyday document viewing tasks and is consistently maintained as part of the MATE project.

Why this product is good

  • Atril, a document viewer that is part of the MATE desktop environment, is appreciated for its simplicity and efficiency. It supports a wide range of document formats including PDF, PostScript, DJVU, and many others. Atril is lightweight, making it an excellent choice for users who prefer minimal resource consumption without sacrificing functionality.

Recommended for

    Atril is recommended for users who utilize the MATE desktop environment or those who need a fast and efficient document viewer that does not hog system resources. It's especially suitable for Linux users who appreciate the traditional desktop experience provided by MATE.

Atril videos

+ Add

Me comprรฉ un atril! - PDP CS800 #Review

More videos:

  • Review - REVIEW / Atril de platillo HC33BW con boom Tama
  • Review - Review: Wostoo Teclado Electrรณnico Piano 61 Teclas con Atril y Microfono

Mindmapper videos

+ Add

Mind Mapping With MindMapper 17, a Getting Started Guide

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atril and Mindmapper)

Atril

Mindmapper

PDF Editor
100 100%
PDF Editor
0% 0
Brainstorming And Ideation
0 0%
Brainstorming And Ideation
100% 100
Office & Productivity
62 62%
Office & Productivity
38% 38
Idea Management
0 0%
Idea Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Atril and Mindmapper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Atril seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Atril mentions (23)

  • KDE celebrates the 29th birthday and kicks off the yearly fundraiser
    MATE was forked around the time GNOME 3 was released and is still going. https://mate-desktop.org Some people consider Cinnamon to be a GNOME 2 spiritual successor while still using a lot of GNOME 3 stuff under the hood. https://projects.linuxmint.com/cinnamon/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • SerenityOS is a love letter to '90s user interfaces
    The closest I know of is Blue95. I have only run the live environment but it worked pretty well and was impressive. "Blue95 is a modern and lightweight desktop experience that is reminiscent of a bygone era of computing. Based on Fedora Atomic Xfce with the Chicago95 theme." https://github.com/winblues/blue95 And if you like Gnome 2.x, there's MATE: https://mate-desktop.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Systemd Rolling Out "run0" As sudo Alternative
    I don't know if you are DE shopping, but I've been very happy for the past few years with the MATE Desktop Environment, which "...is the continuation of GNOME 2. It provides an intuitive and attractive desktop environment using traditional metaphors for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems." https://mate-desktop.org/ Among a great number of things I really like, I will mention that Caja, the MATE version of... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Lobotomizing Gnome
    I agree that there is a balance between customization and "cleanness" in design and implementation. However, I think the GNOME 3 and 4 designers went too far and alienated many users: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-finds-gnome-3-4-to-be-a-total-user-experience-design-failure/ https://medium.com/@fulalas/gnome-42-the-nonsense-continues-7d96c3287f7... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • I Still Use Windows 95 (archived, 2008)
    > Is there a WM out there that can do the basic quality-of-life functions of today's DEs? I'd love a simple, opinionated WM that takes the features we know are useful today (workspaces, expo mode, sensible file manager layouts, system trays) and gives them a color-adjustable window theme inspired by 90's aesthetics, with minimal compositing that can run fast on hardware as minimal as a prototype RISC-V board. Or... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

Mindmapper mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mindmapper yet. Tracking of Mindmapper recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atril and Mindmapper, you can also consider the following products

Evince - Evince is a document viewer for multiple document formats: PDF, Postscript, djvu, tiff, dvi, XPS...

Coggle - Coggle is a simple, beautiful, powerful way of structuring information.

PDF Reader Pro - PDF Reader Pro is an all-in-one PDF office supporting to Read, Annotate, Edit, OCR, Convert, Create & Fill Form, Sign PDFs, TTS on Mac, iOS, Android, and Windows.

Mindomo - Easy-to-create and share mind maps, concept maps, task maps and outlines. Mind mapping software for Web, Desktop, iOS and Android. Mind map with us for free!

ApowerPDF - ApowerPDF is a versatile PDF editor which also features as PDF converter, viewer, creator and more. It provides a perfect solution for all users.

MindMeister - Create, share and collaboratively work on mind maps with MindMeister, the leading online mind mapping software. Includes apps for iPhone, iPad and Android.

Loading...