Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AT-UI VS Hover.css

Compare AT-UI VS Hover.css and see what are their differences

AT-UI logo AT-UI

UI library for developing powerful web interfaces

Hover.css logo Hover.css

A collection of CSS3 powered hover effects to be applied to links, buttons, logos, etc.
  • AT-UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Hover.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-09

AT-UI features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    AT-UI is designed to be easily integrated into existing projects, making it convenient for developers to adopt without major overhauls.
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    AT-UI offers a wide range of components that cover many common UI needs, helping to speed up development and ensure design consistency.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The library comes with thorough documentation, facilitating a smoother learning curve and easier implementation for developers.
  • Focus on Web Applications
    AT-UI is optimized specifically for web applications, aligning well with modern web development practices and requirements.
  • Customizability
    Developers can customize components to fit their specific design requirements, providing flexibility in usage.

Possible disadvantages of AT-UI

  • Limited Community Support
    Being relatively less popular than other UI libraries means there might be fewer community resources, making troubleshooting challenging.
  • Potentially Lacking in Features
    Compared to more established UI frameworks, AT-UI might lack some advanced features or functionalities that are present in other libraries.
  • Consistency with Other Frameworks
    Might not have full compatibility or be completely in sync with updates and changes in other more widely-used frameworks.
  • Learning Curve
    While the documentation is detailed, developers familiar with another framework might find adapting to AT-UI's methodologies to require some adjustment.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    The frequency and reliability of updates can be a concern, especially if the library is maintained by a smaller team.

Hover.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hover.css provides a wide variety of hover effects that are easy to implement by simply applying predefined CSS classes to HTML elements.
  • Wide Variety
    It offers over 41 different effects, providing developers with a broad selection to enhance user interfaces with minimal effort.
  • Customizable
    The effects can be customized to suit the needs of a project, allowing for modifications in timing, color, and behavior using additional CSS.
  • Lightweight
    Hover.css is lightweight, meaning it won't significantly increase the loading time of web pages, maintaining efficient performance.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across most modern browsers, ensuring consistent behavior for users regardless of their choice of browser.

Possible disadvantages of Hover.css

  • Limited Mobile Support
    Hover.css, like any hover-based effect library, is less effective on touch devices that do not support hover states.
  • Dependency on Modern CSS
    Some effects may use modern CSS techniques not supported by outdated browsers, potentially leading to inconsistent experiences.
  • Basic Customizability
    While customizable, the effects might require additional effort to deeply integrate unique interactions compared to writing custom CSS.
  • Overhead
    For simple projects, including an entire library for a few effects might be unnecessary overhead compared to creating bespoke effects with CSS.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AT-UI and Hover.css)
Developer Tools
63 63%
37% 37
Design Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AT-UI and Hover.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AT-UI and Hover.css

AT-UI Reviews

15 of the Most Interesting Vue UI Component Libraries for 2023
AT-UI provide flat UI components for your web applications. There are 14 contributors and not much support available, though there is a starter template on GitHub you can use.

Hover.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Hover.css yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AT-UI and Hover.css, you can also consider the following products

Fish-UI - Introducing Fish-UI is a tool kit based on Vue.js for the web that provides you with a simple API and plenty of documentation and examples to help you get up and running quickly.

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Buefy - Lightweight UI components for Vue.js based on Bulma

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Vux - Vux is a suite of components based on Vue and weUI, providing a Material Design framework for Vue.js.

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.