Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Animate.css VS AT-UI

Compare Animate.css VS AT-UI and see what are their differences

Kollabe
Elevate your Agile Meetings with Engaging Tools for Teams. Our Planning Poker and Retrospectives Tools are designed for seamless, fun collaboration. Perfect for all Teams. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

AT-UI logo AT-UI

UI library for developing powerful web interfaces
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • AT-UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

AT-UI features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    AT-UI is designed to be easily integrated into existing projects, making it convenient for developers to adopt without major overhauls.
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    AT-UI offers a wide range of components that cover many common UI needs, helping to speed up development and ensure design consistency.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The library comes with thorough documentation, facilitating a smoother learning curve and easier implementation for developers.
  • Focus on Web Applications
    AT-UI is optimized specifically for web applications, aligning well with modern web development practices and requirements.
  • Customizability
    Developers can customize components to fit their specific design requirements, providing flexibility in usage.

Possible disadvantages of AT-UI

  • Limited Community Support
    Being relatively less popular than other UI libraries means there might be fewer community resources, making troubleshooting challenging.
  • Potentially Lacking in Features
    Compared to more established UI frameworks, AT-UI might lack some advanced features or functionalities that are present in other libraries.
  • Consistency with Other Frameworks
    Might not have full compatibility or be completely in sync with updates and changes in other more widely-used frameworks.
  • Learning Curve
    While the documentation is detailed, developers familiar with another framework might find adapting to AT-UI's methodologies to require some adjustment.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    The frequency and reliability of updates can be a concern, especially if the library is maintained by a smaller team.

Analysis of Animate.css

Overall verdict

  • Animate.css is generally considered a good tool for adding animations to web projects. It is reliable, simple to use, and widely supported by the development community. However, for highly customized animations or when trying to minimize the performance footprint, custom solutions may be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Animate.css is a well-known library for CSS animations. It is widely used due to its ease of integration, comprehensive collection of animations, and minimal overhead. It allows developers to quickly incorporate animations into their projects without having to write complex CSS from scratch.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for quick, easy-to-use animation solutions.
  • Projects that need standard animations with minimal setup.
  • Developers who prefer using established libraries with active community support.
  • Designers who want to add basic animations without deep CSS knowledge.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and AT-UI)

Animate.css

AT-UI

Developer Tools
57 57%
Developer Tools
43% 43
Design Tools
74 74%
Design Tools
26% 26
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and AT-UI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Animate.css and AT-UI

Animate.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Animate.css yet.
Be the first one to post

AT-UI Reviews

15 of the Most Interesting Vue UI Component Libraries for 2023
AT-UI provide flat UI components for your web applications. There are 14 contributors and not much support available, though there is a starter template on GitHub you can use.
Source: www.codeinwp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

AT-UI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AT-UI yet. Tracking of AT-UI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and AT-UI, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Fish-UI - Introducing Fish-UI is a tool kit based on Vue.js for the web that provides you with a simple API and plenty of documentation and examples to help you get up and running quickly.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Buefy - Lightweight UI components for Vue.js based on Bulma

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Vux - Vux is a suite of components based on Vue and weUI, providing a Material Design framework for Vue.js.

Loading...