ast-grep VS Commit Together by Github

Compare ast-grep VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

PrompTessor

AI Prompt Generator, Optimizer & Library sponsored

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

ast-grep

⚡A polyglot tool for code searching, linting, rewriting!

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Landing page //
2023-05-10

Landing page //
2022-11-04

ast-grep

Website: ast-grep.github.io
$ Details

Edit details

Commit Together by Github

Website: github.blog
$ Details: -

Edit details

ast-grep features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

Enhanced Collaboration
Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
Improved Code Review Process
With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
Accountability
By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
Efficiency in Pair Programming
When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

Complex Commit History
Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
Potential Workflow Conflicts
Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
Initial Setup Overhead
Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
Tooling Compatibility
Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

ast-grep videos

+ Add

Refactor Like a Pro! ✨ Auto-Fix Your Code with ast-grep

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ast-grep and Commit Together by Github)

Commit Together by Github

Developer Tools

55 55%

Developer Tools

45% 45

100 100%

0% 0

Productivity

46 46%

Productivity

54% 54

Software Development

100 100%

Software Development

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ast-grep and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ast-grep seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 24 links to ast-grep, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ast-grep mentions (24)

The Self-Driving Codebase: Full Agent Automation with Otter
The previous post covered how we structured the codebase: Effect conventions, ast-grep enforcement, Drift, and CLAUDE.md to collaborate with Claude Code. You describe what you want, review the output, iterate. That works well. This post is about what happens when you step away entirely: giving the agent a list of issues and letting it work through them while you do something else. In autonomous mode, there's no... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
How we use Effect and ast-grep to make our codebase work better with agents
We use ast-grep as a structural syntax scanner that operates on the syntax tree of code (using tree-sitter under the hood). You define patterns in a YAML file, and it matches those patterns against the codebase. Critically, it’s run as part of the CI pipeline and configured to exit with an error when a banned pattern is found. And they have to be errors, not warnings. We learned this the hard way. Warnings get... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Less human AI agents, please
I linked this elsewhere but, the agent could have a skill to use https://ast-grep.github.io/ to perform such mechanical code changes. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Less human AI agents, please
The proper tool for this is ast-grep (sg) https://ast-grep.github.io/ And an agent can learn to use sg with a skill too. (Or they can use sed) The issue is, at every point you do a replace, you need to verify if it was the right thing to do or if it was a false positive. If you are doing this manually, there's the time to craft the sed or sg query, then for each replacement you need to check it. If there are... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Be intentional about how AI changes your codebase
We use https://ast-grep.github.io (on a pre-commit hook). Bridges the linter gaps nicely. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago