Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Assembla VS Launchpad.net

Compare Assembla VS Launchpad.net and see what are their differences

Assembla logo Assembla

Integrated, on-demand tools to build software faster, with less stress. Get started for free and find out why over 800,000 users trust Assembla.

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical
  • Assembla Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Assembla videos

Assembla Review

More videos:

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Assembla and Launchpad.net)
Git
51 51%
49% 49
Code Collaboration
45 45%
55% 55
Project Management
55 55%
45% 45
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Assembla and Launchpad.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Assembla and Launchpad.net

Assembla Reviews

12 Best JIRA Alternatives in 2019
Assembla is a younger platform than JIRA but offers a broader range of functionality in its core product like git hosting, code deployment, agile tools, time tracking.
Source: www.guru99.com
6 JIRA Alternatives for Your Dev Team
Assembla offers many functions right out-of-the-box that JIRA requires as an add-on, including subversion and git hosting, code deployment, agile tools, time tracking, and social media-style collaboration (message boards, @mentions, activity stream). The greatest irony is that Assembla is actually less expensive.

Launchpad.net Reviews

We have no reviews of Launchpad.net yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Launchpad.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 65 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Assembla mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Assembla yet. Tracking of Assembla recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Launchpad.net mentions (65)

  • Popover API
    This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Firefox Developer Edition and Beta: Try Out Mozilla's .deb Package
    There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Assembla and Launchpad.net, you can also consider the following products

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.