Table of contents
Integrated Development Environment
Launchpad provides a suite of tools to manage projects, bugs, and code, streamlining the development lifecycle.
Bug Tracking System
It offers a robust bug tracking system that facilitates reporting, managing, and fixing bugs, enhancing project quality.
Bazaar Version Control
Launchpad supports the Bazaar version control system, allowing easy collaboration and branch management.
Translation Management
The platform includes a translation tool that helps manage and integrate translations in multiple languages.
PPA Hosting
Launchpad provides Personal Package Archives (PPAs) hosting, which makes it easier to distribute software packages.
Community and Collaboration
It fosters a strong community environment, enabling developers to collaborate effectively on open-source projects.
Integration with Ubuntu
Launchpad integrates closely with Ubuntu, making it the go-to platform for many Ubuntu-related projects and packages.
Free for Open-Source Projects
It is free to use for open-source projects, making it accessible for developers working on non-commercial initiatives.
Promote Launchpad.net. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Launchpad.net is considered a good platform for open-source project development, particularly if you are using Ubuntu or related distributions. However, some users may opt for alternatives like GitHub or GitLab based on feature preferences or community reach.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Launchpad.net is good.
Check the traffic stats of Launchpad.net on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Launchpad.net on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Launchpad.net's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Launchpad.net on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Launchpad.net on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Those are quite good: https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/php Anyway, whatever you write in an earlier PHP version is likely to work on future versions. PHP has remarkable BC. If you're just experimenting, might as well start in the browser: https://alganet.github.io/phasm/ Not all extensions available there, but it has the essentials. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Ubuntu was getting too good so it had to snap half of its value out of existence. You can atill get firefox as a .deb thoughv https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I think I'm missing why you need to require using the toolchain bundled with the last stable Debian release vs having devs just rustup the latest version of the toolchain (or via a PPA [1] or however else they want to install it). The current approach basically guarantees that you're always targeting a ~2-4 year old version of the toolchain and that feels like a particularly weird maintenance burden given how many... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
This doesnโt sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesnโt have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal itโs at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
They do offer the beta channel[1], if that's not too edgy. 1: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
On the other hand you may find large ecosystems revolving around their own dedicated hosting. Gnome and KDE both have their own self-hosted GitLab offerings. For Ubuntu related projects there's Launchpad. Finally as has already been mentioned before GNU Savannah for GNU/FLOSS type projects. That said, having several logins to contribute is not quite ideal. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
On ubuntu this seems to be official (?) ppa: https://launchpad.net/~far2l-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Make sure "far2l-gui" is installed. On ArchLinux there's package in AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/far2l-git (I maintain it). Don't know details other distros. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
If you're using an Ubuntu based distro, then there is a PPA for both stable and latest nightly versions of Neovim. Shell Https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/stable Https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/unstable Then you will be able to install Neovim with apt install neovim. Source: almost 3 years ago
I use the Firefox from the Ubuntu Mozilla Team's PPA and I haven't seen any crashes at all. https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Turns out it was longer ago than I thoughtโ way back in the Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04 days: https://launchpad.net/~mikepurvis/+archive/ubuntu/dpkg. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
- https://launchpad.net/~savoury1 - currently broken packages. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Not to be confused with Canonical's launchpad developer portal. Source: about 3 years ago
PPAs are available for both stable (0.7.x)[1] and unstable (this 0.9)[2] versions. I use the latter and it has worked well for me. 1. https://launchpad.net/~neovim-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/stable. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Quite typical: Linux Mint, managed by apt with a third party repository [1]. On Mac I simply use the official installers from python.org. [1] https://launchpad.net/~deadsnakes/+archive/ubuntu/ppa. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
> You can download Cheerp here. For Debian/Ubuntu, consider using our PPA > https://launchpad.net/~leaningtech-dev/+archive/ubuntu/cheerp-ppa They recommend using an Ubuntu PPA with Debian? That's... Definitely a bold strategy. Let's hope it works out for them. (I mean, given that they themselves suggest doing so, I take it that's the PPA has been properly tested on Debian, and that they'll answer support requests... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Launchpad.net, a development platform created by Canonical Ltd., primarily serves open-source projects related to the Ubuntu operating system. Despite the presence of robust competitors such as GitLab, GitHub, BitBucket, and others, Launchpad maintains a distinct position in the code collaboration and software development domain. Over the years, the platform has garnered mixed reviews from the developer community, with opinions often reflecting both its niche specialization in Ubuntu-related projects and its perceived limitations compared to industry giants.
Launchpad is particularly appreciated for its strong integration with Ubuntu and its related ecosystem, offering services like bug tracking, code review, and language translations. For developers focused on Ubuntu and other open-source initiatives, Launchpad is often a preferred choice due to its seamless support for PPAs (Personal Package Archives). This makes it highly relevant for managing software versions and packages in the Ubuntu environment, as indicated by numerous mentions regarding PPA usage for software like Firefox, Neovim, and Cheerp.
The platform is also lauded for being a part of a smaller set of dedicated project hosting services that target specific niches. It helms the support for sizeable ecosystems revolving around Ubuntu-related projects, thus providing a fertile ground for developers working in this realm. This targeted approach distinguishes it from more generalized platforms like GitHub, making it an invaluable asset for Ubuntu-dependent workflows.
Despite its strengths, Launchpad does face criticism, mostly revolving around its UI and feature set which some perceive as less intuitive and comprehensive compared to competitors like GitHub and GitLab. The feedback mentions a multi-login necessity to contribute to various projects, which some users find cumbersome compared to the more streamlined workflows offered by some of its competitors.
Moreover, while the platform supports functionalities pertinent to Ubuntu, it is less versatile for developers working in diverse environments or those seeking robust CI/CD integrations beyond what Ubuntu and related settings specifically require. Developers not entrenched in the Ubuntu ecosystem might find platforms such as GitHub or GitLab more accommodating to a broader range of development needs, such as advanced collaboration tools, integrations, and enterprise features.
Launchpad.net remains a valid alternative to larger platforms for those entrenched in Ubuntu and open-source development. Its focus on providing a tailored experience for managing Ubuntu PPAs and packages grants it a dedicated user base who rely on these functionalities. However, for developers seeking extensive feature sets and a more universal application across diverse projects, areas requiring collaboration on multiple ecosystems, and integration options, larger platforms may be preferable. While recognizing its limitations, Launchpad holds its own niche by continually supporting and enhancing Ubuntu-centric projects. This well-defined focus ensures its ongoing relevance and utility in specific technical communities.
Do you know an article comparing Launchpad.net to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Launchpad.net good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Launchpad.net here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
