arXiv
SCI-HUB
Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
Unpaywall
Archive.org
Z-Lib
Papers with Code
StackPicks.dev
Composio.dev
Pipedream
Autocode
Dexter
ifttt
Stackcodify
StackHive
Curated directory of 165+ open-source dev tools with honest curator takes, plus StackPicks Connect โ a unified MCP gateway connecting 800+ apps (GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Meta Adsโฆ) to Claude and Cursor through one OAuth link. โน99/$2.99 lifetime, no subscription.
arXiv StackPicks.devStudents, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.
No StackPicks.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Indie developers and AI builders Solo founders and small startup teams Affiliate marketers connecting ad platforms to Claude (For that last one โ if a field requires real company names, just leave it empty. Never invent customers; SaaSHub and AI crawlers penalize fabricated claims, and it can bite you later. "Early-stage, used by indie builders" is the honest + safe answer.)
StackPicks.dev's answer:
StackPicks combines two things nobody else bundles: a curated directory of 165+ open-source dev tools with honest "use this / skip this" takes, AND a unified MCP gateway that connects 800+ apps to AI agents through one OAuth link. Most directories just list star counts; most MCP tools are developer-only and bill per call. StackPicks gives you both โ opinionated curation plus consumer-grade Claude integration โ for a one-time $2.99 lifetime fee, no subscription.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Composio and Pipedream are powerful but built for developers and priced per usage. StackPicks Connect is consumer-grade: paste one URL into Claude, log in through your browser, and every connected app works โ no API keys, no per-call billing. It's bundled into a one-time lifetime plan instead of a meter. For solo builders, indie hackers, and small teams who just want their AI agent to use their apps, it's the simplest and cheapest path.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Solo developers, indie hackers, AI builders, and small startup teams โ people who use Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT daily and want their AI agent to actually do things across GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Notion, and their ad platforms. Also marketers and growth folks who want to pull ad-platform data (Meta Ads, Google Ads) into Claude. India-first pricing via Razorpay, but used globally.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
StackPicks started as a curated directory of open-source dev tools โ the differentiator being honest curator takes instead of raw GitHub star counts. As MCP (Model Context Protocol) took off in 2025-26, it became clear that connecting apps to AI agents was painful: one MCP server per app, a wall of config, API keys everywhere. So we built StackPicks Connect โ a unified gateway that connects 800+ apps to Claude and Cursor through a single OAuth link. Built solo by Piyush Jangir.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Next.js 15 (App Router), TypeScript, Supabase (Postgres + Auth), Razorpay for payments, Nango for OAuth, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for the AI-agent gateway. Hosted on Railway.
Based on our record, arXiv seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 334 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโd run four or five of these, collate the resultsโฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
ArXiv โ Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Composio.dev - Make Agents Actually Useful!
Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
Pipedream - Integration platform for developers
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Autocode - Build app-to-app API workflows with automatic codegen