arXiv
SCI-HUB
Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
Unpaywall
Archive.org
Z-Lib
Papers with Code
NodeBB
Discourse
XenForo
phpBB
Flarum
MyBB
Vanilla Forums
Vanilla
arXiv NodeBBStudents, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.
NodeBB is recommended for businesses, communities, and developers who require a customizable and real-time forum solution. It's particularly suitable for tech-savvy users who want to leverage Node.js and those looking to integrate forums with existing web applications.
NodeBB is a next-generation discussion platform that utilizes web sockets for instant interactions and real-time notifications. NodeBB forums have many modern features out of the box such as social network integration and streaming discussions. NodeBB is an open source project which can be forked on GitHub.
I was lucky enough to stumble on NodeBB in the early days right as we were transitioning a large user base from another forum and needed a platform that could handle the volume and speed of interactions that our users demanded. We took a big risk on NodeBB in 2014 when it was brand new and it has paid off in spades over the years. For seven years our users have consistently raved about ease of use and performance of the platform while on the back end we have been thrilled with the ease of management and low resource needs of hosting even for a site hitting hundreds of millions of hits per month. It is modern, regularly updated, has a great community and team behind it. We've always gotten lots of support and know that we made the right choice and continue to choose NodeBB as our forum of choice.
Based on our record, arXiv seems to be a lot more popular than NodeBB. While we know about 334 links to arXiv, we've tracked only 4 mentions of NodeBB. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโd run four or five of these, collate the resultsโฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
ArXiv โ Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
You could take a look at https://nodebb.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
> I'm a big fan of https://nodebb.org/ TIL to what shit Netgate moved pfSense forums to. I'm glad you are fine with it, but not only my FullHD monitor is not a smartphone, so I don't need 400% fonts on everything (and post dates on the faaaaar right clearly shows nobody ever even used the forum) and most importantly - search doesn't work. It's not like the previous forum had a good search, but at least it worked.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I wrote about this a while ago for Slack/forums: https://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/archives/3451 but the points still hold. HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29154216 Full featured OSS forum you can self-host or let them host for you (for $). Big fan of letting people use the search interface they want, which is almost always Google. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
You said it's based on. This means that there are modifications to the implementation of nodebb. So where is your modifications' source code then? stackfoss/stackfoss is just a single readme file. Source: over 3 years ago
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Discourse - Discourse is an open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.
Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
XenForo - Intuitive. Social. Engaging. Fast. XenForo brings a fresh outlook to forum software.
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
phpBB - Raspberry Pi. The Raspberry Pi is a cheap, credit-card sized computer. The official website uses phpBB for their discussion forums. phpBB is not affiliated with nor responsible for any of the sites listed on the showcase.