
Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
Pinboard
Instapaper
HTTrack
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Shottr
BrandBird
ScreenStudio
CleanShot X
Supasnap
Tella
Loom
Take beautiful screenshots instantly

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ArchiveBox seems to be a lot more popular than Xnapper. While we know about 95 links to ArchiveBox, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Xnapper.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | xnapper.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
Xnapper is a nataive macOS Application that enables users to take beautiful screenshots instantly, making it "social media ready" the moment you snap your screen.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
Best SCREENSHOT Tool for Mac | Xnapper Review (FULL DEMO)
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and Xnapper.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and Xnapper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
In conclusion, these five screenshot apps for Mac offer a range of features to cater to different user needs. Xnapper stands out as the best all-in-one screenshot tool with its automatic beautification and screen...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
600 hours to build another screenshot editor? Which just adds some gradient and aligns the image? What are some differences between your product and the following free services? https://screenzy.io/ https://screenshot.rocks/... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
No, it's taking a screenshot of the browser's content, then adding padding to the surrounding image, and letting you pick a colour for it. Screenshot Software like Cleanshot X and Xnapper have this feature built in, either as a default... Source: almost 3 years ago
Reminds me of https://xnapper.com/, except for code. I imagine some people might tweet snippets of code, and this makes the snippet look much more visually appealing. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and Xnapper, you can also consider the following products.

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or Xnapper:

Shottr is a free macOS screenshot app with scrolling screenshots, OCR, annotation and measurement instruments.
Compare Shottr to ArchiveBox or Xnapper:



Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or Xnapper:
