Software Alternatives & Startups

ArchiveBox VS Perkeep

Compare ArchiveBox VS Perkeep and see what are their differences

ArchiveBox

The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Perkeep

Perkeep is a set of open source formats, protocols, and software for modeling, storing, searching...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ArchiveBox should be more popular than Perkeep. It has been mentioned 95 times since March 2021.

social mentions
95 vs 18
Bookmark Manager popularity
93% vs 7%
alternatives listed
162 vs 18

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ArchiveBox
Perkeep
Website archivebox.io perkeep.org
Pricing
Open source Free
Open source
Platforms
Linux Mac OSX Docker
—
Company 2017 —
Listed in

About ArchiveBox and Perkeep

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ArchiveBox
Perkeep

ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...

Read more about ArchiveBox

No description of Perkeep yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ArchiveBox 8 features
Perkeep 5 features
  • Offline website saving
  • Tagging
  • Scheduled archiving
  • Recursive crawling
  • Media extraction
  • Article text extraction
  • Static HTML exports
  • Full-text search
  • Open Source
    Perkeep is an open-source project, which means it allows community contributions, transparency in development, and the ability for users to customize and modify the software according to their needs.
  • Data Ownership
    Perkeep emphasizes personal data ownership, enabling users to store and manage their data without reliance on third-party services or platforms that might use the data for their purposes.
  • Flexible Architecture
    Its design supports different types of storage backends and easily integrates with diverse data sources, making it adaptable to various user requirements and environments.
  • Data Permanency
    Perkeep is built to ensure data durability and permanence, supporting the idea of owning a personal archive without data being easily lost or corrupted.
  • Extensive Metadata Support
    Perkeep provides rich metadata capabilities, allowing users to store detailed information about their files and enabling advanced search and organization.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of Perkeep can be challenging and may require technical knowledge, serving as a barrier for less tech-savvy users.
  • Limited User Interface
    Perkeep’s user interface might not be as polished or intuitive as commercial alternatives, which can affect the user experience, particularly for non-technical users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Perkeep might demand more resources compared to some other solutions, potentially leading to performance issues on less powerful hardware.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, support is predominantly community-driven, which can lead to variability in assistance and support availability compared to commercial services that offer dedicated support.
  • Ongoing Maintenance
    Since Perkeep is self-hosted, ongoing maintenance tasks such as updates, backups, and troubleshooting fall on the user, which can increase the long-term management overhead.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ArchiveBox
Perkeep

Overall verdict

  • ArchiveBox is a versatile and robust solution for individuals or organizations seeking to preserve web content. It provides a wide range of archiving options and allows for extensive customization. However, as a self-hosted tool, it requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain, which may not be ideal for non-technical users. Overall, it is a good tool if you have the technical capability and need to consistently archive online assets.

Why this product is good

  • ArchiveBox is an open-source self-hosted tool designed to help users save and manage web content offline. It is appreciated for its ability to archive web content including static HTML, PDFs, and media files in a format that is easy to navigate and long-lasting, even if the source website becomes inaccessible. The tool supports multiple input methods, including browser integrations, and is capable of running on various platforms, thus offering flexibility and scalability for personal and professional use.

Recommended for

    ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.

No analysis of Perkeep yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ArchiveBox 2 videos + Add
Perkeep 1 video + Add

Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)

More videos

  • - Installing ArchiveBox On Ubuntu 20.04 Using A Hyper-V VM To Preserve OSINT Investigation Findings

LinuxFest Northwest 2018: Perkeep

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ArchiveBox
Perkeep
93% 93%
7% 7%
91% 91%
9% 9%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and Perkeep.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • Django
  • SQLite
  • Wget
  • Chromium
  • Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
  • singlefile
  • readability
  • mercury
  • git
  • ripgrep
  • sonic

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

What's the story behind your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • journalists
  • lawyers
  • librarians
  • digital preservation specialists
  • researchers
  • students
  • homelab / self-hosting community

User comments

Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and Perkeep. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ArchiveBox 95 mentions
Perkeep 18 mentions
  • hister
    Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: Any Alternatives to Archive.ph & co?
    I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Wikipedia bans Archive.today after site executed DDoS and altered web captures
    A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

View more

View more

Alternatives to ArchiveBox and Perkeep

When comparing ArchiveBox and Perkeep, you can also consider the following products.