
Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
Pinboard
Instapaper
HTTrack
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

GitKraken
SourceTree
SmartGit
Fork
Tower
TortoiseGit
GitHub
GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Which is more popular?
GitHub Desktop might be a bit more popular than ArchiveBox. We know about 136 links to it since March 2021 and only 94 links to ArchiveBox.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | desktop.github.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
No description of GitHub Desktop yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
No analysis of GitHub Desktop yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and GitHub Desktop.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and GitHub Desktop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
Creating branches and switching to existing ones isn’t a hassle, so is merging code with the master branch. Furthermore, you can track your changes with GitHub Desktop. Check out our detailed guide on how to use...
GitHub Desktop is the global standard for working with Git-related tasks in a graphical user interface (GUI). It is an open-source tool and hence completely free to use for all sorts of projects. It is available for...
GitHub Desktop is, perhaps, the most famous solution for working with Git in a visual interface. It is familiar to all developers keeping their repositories on GitHub (Git repository hosting service used for...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I run an ArchiveBox instance locally. Recommended! https://archivebox.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Optional: You can also download GitHub Desktop (https://desktop.github.com) if you prefer a GUI version, but this guide focuses on Git Bash to understand the basics. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Download the latest version from the GitHub Desktop website. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I’m not going to dive into Git commands here — you can find plenty of tutorials online. If you’re not a fan of using the plain terminal CLI, you can also manage repositories with tools like GitHub Desktop or SourceTree, which provide a... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and GitHub Desktop, you can also consider the following products.

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or GitHub Desktop:

The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.
Compare GitKraken to ArchiveBox or GitHub Desktop:


Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.
Compare SourceTree to ArchiveBox or GitHub Desktop:

Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or GitHub Desktop:

SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...
Compare SmartGit to ArchiveBox or GitHub Desktop: