
Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
Pinboard
Instapaper
HTTrack
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

CodePen
replit
JSFiddle
GitHub
StackBlitz
VS Code
JS Bin
Online playground for React

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, CodeSandbox should be more popular than ArchiveBox. It has been mentioned 313 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | codesandbox.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | Startup from The Netherlands · 1 - 9 employees · 2017 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
No description of CodeSandbox yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
A browser IDE that's actually GOOD? (CodeSandbox.io Review!)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and CodeSandbox.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and CodeSandbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
Codesandbox is an online code editor and prototyping tool that makes creating and sharing web apps faster. Codesandbox: Online code editor and ide for rapid web development.
CodeSandbox can be thought of as a much more powerful and complete take on JSFiddle. True to its name, CodeSandbox provides a complete code editor experience and a sandboxed environment for front-end development.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I run an ArchiveBox instance locally. Recommended! https://archivebox.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
To begin, you can start creating your own react app using the command line or can directly go to CodeSandbox if you want to skip using the command line which is faster. CodeSandbox is an online code editor and prototype tool that speeds... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
To begin, you can create a react app using the command line or any code editor (e.g., VSCode). You can also try using CodeSandbox as an online code editor that is simple to use and allows you to deploy your code. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
If you are in a rush to open unknown repos, use GitHub Codespaces or codesandbox with Copilot or another AI integration to analyze the repo for malicious intent and to run it in a safe environment. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and CodeSandbox, you can also consider the following products.

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or CodeSandbox:



Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.
Compare replit to ArchiveBox or CodeSandbox:

Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or CodeSandbox:

Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle code editor.
Compare JSFiddle to ArchiveBox or CodeSandbox: