Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ArchiveBox VS Cloudsmith

Compare ArchiveBox VS Cloudsmith and see what are their differences

ArchiveBox

The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Alternatives Is it good?
Cloudsmith

Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
ReleasePad
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ArchiveBox seems to be a lot more popular than Cloudsmith. While we know about 95 links to ArchiveBox, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Cloudsmith.

social mentions
95 vs 2
Bookmark Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
162 vs 68

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ArchiveBox
Cloudsmith
Website archivebox.io cloudsmith.com
Pricing
Open source Free
Paid Free trial Official pricing
Platforms
Linux Mac OSX Docker
—
Company 2017 —
Listed in
Bookmark Manager Bookmarks Utilities Internet Archiving Digital Preservation Backups +3
Package Manager Software Development Developer Tools DevOps Tools +1

About ArchiveBox and Cloudsmith

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ArchiveBox
Cloudsmith

ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...

Read more about ArchiveBox

Cloudsmith is a single source of truth for all your software assets, available to teams, individuals, customers and build processes anywhere on the planet. Cloudsmith is the only cloud-native, universal package management solution, allowing your organization to create, store and share packages in...

Read more about Cloudsmith

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ArchiveBox 8 features
Cloudsmith 5 features
  • Offline website saving
  • Tagging
  • Scheduled archiving
  • Recursive crawling
  • Media extraction
  • Article text extraction
  • Static HTML exports
  • Full-text search
  • Universal Support
    Cloudsmith supports a wide range of package formats, enabling seamless management for different types of software artifacts in one place.
  • Security Features
    Offers comprehensive security features including encryption, access controls, and logging, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of your packages.
  • Reliable Hosting and Distribution
    Provides a reliable cloud-based system for hosting and distributing software packages, reducing infrastructure overhead and ensuring high availability.
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Integration
    Easily integrates with popular CI/CD tools, streamlining the build, release, and deployment process for development teams.
  • Global Content Delivery Network (CDN)
    Utilizes a global CDN to ensure fast and reliable delivery of software packages to developers around the world.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Cloudsmith can be expensive compared to self-hosted solutions, particularly for organizations with large-scale needs.
  • Complexity
    The vast array of features might be overwhelming for new users or small teams with simple package management needs.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    Being a cloud-based solution, Cloudsmith requires reliable internet access, which could be a potential issue in environments with limited connectivity.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may encounter a learning curve when adopting Cloudsmith, particularly if they are transitioning from a simpler or different package management system.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ArchiveBox
Cloudsmith

Overall verdict

  • ArchiveBox is a versatile and robust solution for individuals or organizations seeking to preserve web content. It provides a wide range of archiving options and allows for extensive customization. However, as a self-hosted tool, it requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain, which may not be ideal for non-technical users. Overall, it is a good tool if you have the technical capability and need to consistently archive online assets.

Why this product is good

  • ArchiveBox is an open-source self-hosted tool designed to help users save and manage web content offline. It is appreciated for its ability to archive web content including static HTML, PDFs, and media files in a format that is easy to navigate and long-lasting, even if the source website becomes inaccessible. The tool supports multiple input methods, including browser integrations, and is capable of running on various platforms, thus offering flexibility and scalability for personal and professional use.

Recommended for

    ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Cloudsmith is generally considered a good platform for managing software distribution and package management.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudsmith is appreciated for its robust features and flexibility in handling various package types, making it a versatile choice for developers. It offers secure, scalable, and private repositories for managing your software assets and supports multiple package formats, including Docker, Maven, npm, and more. The platform also provides strong security features to ensure the protection of software packages.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking a reliable and secure platform for software package distribution.
  • Developers who need support for multiple package formats in a unified platform.
  • Teams looking for a scalable solution to manage private repositories with strong access controls.
  • Companies interested in improving their DevOps processes through integrated package management solutions.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ArchiveBox 2 videos + Add
Cloudsmith 1 video + Add

Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)

More videos

  • - Installing ArchiveBox On Ubuntu 20.04 Using A Hyper-V VM To Preserve OSINT Investigation Findings

Using Cloudsmith to store and distribute any type of file

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ArchiveBox
Cloudsmith
100% 100%
Bookmark Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Bookmarks
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and Cloudsmith.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • Django
  • SQLite
  • Wget
  • Chromium
  • Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
  • singlefile
  • readability
  • mercury
  • git
  • ripgrep
  • sonic

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

What's the story behind your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • journalists
  • lawyers
  • librarians
  • digital preservation specialists
  • researchers
  • students
  • homelab / self-hosting community

User comments

Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and Cloudsmith. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

ArchiveBox no reviews yet
Cloudsmith no reviews yet

We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post

  • Repository Management Tools
    mindmajix.com · Jan 2023

    Cloundsmith Package is one of the best DevOps tools that is available in the Repository Management space and also ensures that levels up your DevOps enterprise-grade repositories as like Debian, Maven, Python, Ruby,...

  • What is Artifactory?
    blog.packagecloud.io · Feb 2022

    Cloudsmith Package makes sure that your DevOps enterprise-grade repositories, such as Vagrant, Ruby, Python, Maven, Debian, and others, are leveled up. It allows you to concentrate on your product because Cloudsmith...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ArchiveBox 95 mentions
Cloudsmith 2 mentions
  • hister
    Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: Any Alternatives to Archive.ph & co?
    I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Wikipedia bans Archive.today after site executed DDoS and altered web captures
    A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

View more

  • How a Beige Keyboard Changed My Life: From C64 to CTO
    Now, well beyond the fall of Newzbin, and with a stint in corporate land, security, and fintech, I’m co-founder and CTO of Cloudsmith (website). We use our unique blend of cloud-native artifact management to secure the software supply... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Lazygit: A simple terminal UI for Git commands
    Linus Torvalds about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzl1B7nB9Kc Distros (Debian in particular comes to mind) have some really annoying packaging rules, and as a maintainer of a Go program, it's a huge pain, so we decided to just... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to ArchiveBox and Cloudsmith

When comparing ArchiveBox and Cloudsmith, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...