
Akto
Metlo API Security
Pynt.io
Discover your API surface and test authorization, OWASP API Top 10, and business-logic risks before production. Start free with no credit card.

CloudFlare
Amazon CloudFront
Pulse Secure
Sucuri
Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager
Tor Browser
Imperva Cloud Application Security
Secure Content Delivery Network, DDoS, WAF Service

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, StackPath seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | apyguard.com | stackpath.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ApyGuard is a developer-first API security testing platform that finds vulnerabilities and authorization flaws before they reach production. Most teams don't have an accurate picture of the APIs their applications actually expose. OpenAPI files go stale, and AI coding assistants (Copilot,...
No description of StackPath yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of ApyGuard yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
ApyGuard - API Discovery Chrome Extension
More videos
How to Fully Connect WordPress Site with StackPath CDN
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ApyGuard and StackPath.
ApyGuard's answer
ApyGuard starts from source code, not traffic. Most API security platforms watch production traffic to discover APIs — which means they can only see endpoints that are already deployed and receiving requests. ApyGuard discovers endpoints directly from the codebase, generates OpenAPI documentation from what it finds, and tests for OWASP API Top 10 issues — especially authorization flaws like BOLA and BFLA — before the code ships. It also comes with APIScout, a free VS Code extension (also on Open VSX for Cursor and Windsurf) that runs endpoint discovery entirely locally, so no code ever leaves the developer's machine. And unlike most of the category, pricing is public and self-serve, starting at $129/month.
ApyGuard's answer
It depends on your situation, honestly. If you're an enterprise with a security operations team and a six-figure budget, traffic-based platforms are mature options. ApyGuard is built for the teams those platforms don't serve: startups and SMBs that ship APIs every week without a dedicated AppSec department. Compared to spec-first tools, ApyGuard doesn't require you to already have an OpenAPI file — it generates one from your code. Compared to traffic-based tools, it tests pre-production instead of after exposure. Compared to per-endpoint enterprise pricing, it starts at $129/month with a seven-day trial, no credit card and no sales call. You can find out what your API actually exposes the same day you sign up.
ApyGuard's answer
Backend developers, DevSecOps engineers, and engineering leaders at startups and small-to-mid-sized technology companies — typically SaaS, fintech, e-commerce, and healthcare teams. A fast-growing part of our audience is teams building with AI assistants like Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code, who need to know exactly which endpoints their AI-assisted codebase actually exposes.
ApyGuard's answer
The recurring problem: teams almost never had an accurate picture of the APIs their applications exposed. OpenAPI files went stale, undocumented endpoints shipped every sprint, and the tools that could help were priced and designed for large enterprises. AI coding assistants made the gap worse - code ships faster than anyone documents or reviews it. ApyGuard was built to close that gap from the source code side: discover what's really there, document it automatically, and test it before production - at a price a startup can actually pay.
ApyGuard's answer
Python (static analysis and scanning engine) TypeScript (web application and VS Code extension)
Share your experience with using ApyGuard and StackPath. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ApyGuard yet. Be the first one to post
StackPath was founded in 2015 by Lance Crosby but now operates under the same people who ran SoftLayer, a cloud solutions and services provider, bought over by IBM. Having acquired several strategic companies,...
Stackpath also provides security features, such as SSL, DDoS protection, WAF, and firewall, to protect your web content and applications. Stackpath has a simple and transparent pricing model and a user-friendly...
StackPath offers content shipment services with WAF and totally recorded API. It provides services with instant setup, purging and real-time circumstances. Stack path offers plans for mid to high range users which are...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ApyGuard since Aug 2026.
StackPath (Dallas, Texas) | Remote | Full-Time | https://stackpath.com I am looking for Senior Systems Engineer for our Kubernetes infrastructure: https://stackpath.applytojob.com/apply/kLd89ZuXsV/Senior-Systems-Engineer The Systems... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
When comparing ApyGuard and StackPath, you can also consider the following products.

Akto is an Instant, Open Source API Security product. Discover all your APIs and find vulnerabilities by running 100+built-in tests. Write custom tests and automate in Akto.
Compare Akto to ApyGuard or StackPath:

Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.
Compare CloudFlare to ApyGuard or StackPath:

Open Source API Security Platform
Compare Metlo API Security to ApyGuard or StackPath:

Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery web service.
Compare Amazon CloudFront to ApyGuard or StackPath:

Pynt offers dynamic API security testing for developers and testers to identify and fix vulnerabilities during the development lifecycle.
Compare Pynt.io to ApyGuard or StackPath:

Pulse Secure provides a consolidated offering for access control, SSL VPN, and mobile device security. Contact Pulse Secure at 408-372-9600 to get a free demo.
Compare Pulse Secure to ApyGuard or StackPath: