Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AppWrite VS RemoteStorage

Compare AppWrite VS RemoteStorage and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.

RemoteStorage logo RemoteStorage

An open protocol for per-user storage OWN YOUR DATA
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • RemoteStorage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-15

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

RemoteStorage features and specs

  • User Control
    RemoteStorage allows users to host their own data, giving them greater control over their information and how it's shared with applications. This enhances privacy and security for users.
  • Decentralization
    The platform supports decentralized data storage, reducing reliance on centralized servers and eliminating single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    RemoteStorage uses a simple protocol that encourages interoperability between various applications, allowing users to switch between apps without losing access to their data.
  • Open Source
    The entire RemoteStorage protocol and libraries are open source, fostering transparency and allowing developers to contribute to its development.
  • Developer-Friendly
    Developers can easily use RemoteStorage libraries to integrate the protocol into their applications, facilitating seamless data management across different services.

Possible disadvantages of RemoteStorage

  • Setup Complexity
    While RemoteStorage offers user control, the need to set up a personal data hosting solution might be complex and challenging for non-technical users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche solution, the ecosystem of applications supporting RemoteStorage might be smaller compared to more ubiquitous cloud storage services.
  • Performance Variability
    The performance of data access and synchronization can be variable depending on the hosting infrastructure chosen by the user, potentially leading to slower speeds.
  • Data Management Responsibility
    Users are responsible for managing backups and ensuring data availability, which can add an additional layer of responsibility and risk.
  • Potential Scalability Issues
    Depending on how the personal storage solution is set up, users might experience scalability issues as their storage needs grow.

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppWrite and RemoteStorage)

AppWrite

RemoteStorage

Developer Tools
86 86%
Developer Tools
14% 14
Backend As A Service
100 100%
Backend As A Service
0% 0
Realtime Backend / API
80 80%
Realtime Backend / API
20% 20
App Development
0 0%
App Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AppWrite and RemoteStorage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppWrite and RemoteStorage

AppWrite Reviews

  1. dndiel
    Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    🏁 Competitors: Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    👎 Cons:    Self hosted
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwrite’s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. It’s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
Source: digitalcruch.com
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

RemoteStorage Reviews

We have no reviews of RemoteStorage yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite should be more popular than RemoteStorage. It has been mentiond 174 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppWrite mentions (174)

  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Flutter vs Native: Why Flutter Wins for TV App Development
    Flutter plays well with modern backend solutions like Firebase, Supabase, AWS Amplify, Appwrite, and PocketBase. This gives you a variety of options to choose from whether you are an indie developer, startup, established company, agency, or enterprise. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • 5 Tools Every Developer Must Use in 2024
    Appwrite also allows you to manage your application's backend services through a simple and intuitive dashboard, making it easy to monitor and control your resources. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    . Netlify : Deploy your web projects with ease. . Render : Host web applications and static sites effortlessly. . GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. . Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. . Vercel: Deploy websites and applications with automatic deployments. . Cyclic.sh: Host your static sites with zero configuration. . Appwrite:... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Why Appwrite Is Your Ideal BaaS in 2024 I'm
    Appwrite is a comprehensive Backend as a Service (BaaS) platform designed to help developers build and scale applications quickly and efficiently. Whether you're a solo indie hacker or part of a growing startup, Appwrite provides the essential features you need—database management, authentication, storage, and cloud functions—all in one unified platform. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

RemoteStorage mentions (21)

  • A Local-First Case Study
    Https://remotestorage.io while it's a specific protocol for storing user data on a compatible server, their library also provides Google Drive integration. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Https://remotestorage.io/ was a protocol intended for this. IIRC the visison was that all applications could implement this and you could provide that application with your remotestorage URL, which you could self host. I looked into this some time ago as I was fed up with WebDAV being the only viable open protocol for file shares/synchronization (especially after hosting my own NextCloud instance, which OOMed... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Show HN: RemoteStorage – sync localStorage across devices and browsers
    Not to be confused with https://remotestorage.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Simple Lasts Longer
    This doesn't support the various consumer cloud storage APIs, but you've just reminded me of a project I ran into years ago that seems to still be around: https://remotestorage.io/ There's also Solid which attempts to do something similar: https://solidproject.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Simple Lasts Longer
    I have seen one web app uses the remote storage library. It does fit your criteria, but I don't think there is much traction yet. [0]: https://remotestorage.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppWrite and RemoteStorage, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

PocketBase.io - Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.

restdb.io - restdb.io lets you create databases and REST APIs quickly. Development databases are free. Powerful web-based and mobile-friendly data management.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Etebase - Etebase makes it easy to build end-to-end encrypted applications by taking care of the encryption and its related challenges.

Loading...