AppWrite VS Porter
Compare AppWrite VS Porter and see what are their differences
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool.
featured
AppWrite
Supabase
Firebase
Clerk
PocketBase.io
Directus
Next.js
PropelAuth
Porter
Heroku
Pulumi
Render UIKit
DigitalOcean
Coolify
Railway
replit
AppWrite PorterAppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.
Porter is recommended for small to medium-sized development teams, startups, and businesses that wish to simplify their cloud application deployment processes without getting into the intricacies of Kubernetes. It is especially beneficial for teams with limited resources or expertise in managing complex cloud infrastructure who require a straightforward and efficient deployment platform.
No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.
Based on our record, AppWrite seems to be a lot more popular than Porter. While we know about 178 links to AppWrite, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Porter. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Initially, I was using the Supabase free tier, but I was hitting the limits, and my app was becoming stale. Then I switched to Appwrite. Both are totally different; one is SQL, while the latter one is NoSQL. Although use node-appwrite package to skip the manual schema add-ons. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Appwrite is an open-source platform that simplifies backend setup by providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and hosting all in one place. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโre hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Https://getporter.org/ https://getporter.dev/ One of you is going to have to rename yourselves... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Porter - a fully-managed PaaS that lets teams automate DevOps. The free basic tier for porter cloud offers management of 1 cluster with up to 10 vCPU and 20 GB memory. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
There are some YC startups (AtomizedHq.com and getporter.dev) that are doing really interesting things with cross-cloud K8S deployments (more like heroku). These are all different bits of the serverless microservices scaling puzzle. We are a long way off but trying to think long term, even as a 2 person alpha prototype :). Source: almost 5 years ago
But then I saw a YC startup called Porter (https://getporter.dev) that made getting the cluster set up and deploying the apps from Heroku on AWS EKS a piece of cake. It's really great. There is another YC startup called Atomized (https://atomizedhq.com) that I've been looking at that's also really great. They are both worth checking out, and the teams from both are super-responsive. Source: about 5 years ago
Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.
Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.
Pulumi - Cloud Infrastructure for any cloud using languages you already know and love.
Clerk - Clerk.io, the artificial intelligence for e-commerce that knows your customers interests.
Render UIKit - React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs