AppWrite VS Materialize
Compare AppWrite VS Materialize and see what are their differences
A unified, OpenAI-compatible gateway to every major LLM provider. One endpoint, one key, one bill - with automatic routing and failover.
sponsored
AppWrite
Supabase
Firebase
Clerk
PocketBase.io
Xano
Convex.dev
Auth0
Materialize
Apache Flink
Apache Kafka
RisingWave
ClickHouse
OctoSQL
Amazon Kinesis
Timeplus
AppWrite MaterializeAppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.
No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.
Based on our record, AppWrite should be more popular than Materialize. It has been mentiond 178 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Initially, I was using the Supabase free tier, but I was hitting the limits, and my app was becoming stale. Then I switched to Appwrite. Both are totally different; one is SQL, while the latter one is NoSQL. Although use node-appwrite package to skip the manual schema add-ons. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Appwrite is an open-source platform that simplifies backend setup by providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and hosting all in one place. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโre hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Did I miss in the article where OP reveals the magic database that actually does this? 3rd party solutions like https://readyset.io/ and https://materialize.com/ exist specifically because databases donโt actually have what we all want materialized views to be. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
This triggered some associations for me. Strongest was Cells[0], a library for Common Lisp CLOS. The earliest reference I can find is 2002[1], making it over 20 years old. Second is incremental view maintenance systems like Feldera[2] or Materialize[3]. These use sophisticated theories (z-sets and differential dataflow) to apply efficient updates over sets of data, which generalizes the case of single variables.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
It's hard to write something that is both accessible and well-motivated. The best uses of category theory is when the morphisms are far more exotic than "regular functions". E.g. It would be nice to describe a circuit of live queries (like https://materialize.com/ stuff) with proper caching, joins, etc. Figuring this out is a bit of an open problem. Haskell's standard library's Monad and stuff are watered down to... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> [...] `https://materialize.com/` to solve their memory issues [...] Disclaimer: I work at Materialize Recently there have been major improvements in Materialize's memory usage as well as using disk to swap out some data. I find it pretty easy to hook up to Postgres/MySQL/Kafka instances: https://materialize.com/blog/materialize-emulator/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I agree. So many disparate solutions. The streaming sql primitives are by themselves good enough (e.g. `tumble`, `hop` or `session` windows), but the infrastructural components are always rough in real life use cases. Crossing fingers for solutions like `https://github.com/feldera/feldera` to solve their memory issues, or `https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/materialized-view` to solve reliable streaming consumption.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative
Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.
Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.
Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.
Clerk - Clerk.io, the artificial intelligence for e-commerce that knows your customers interests.
RisingWave - RisingWave is a stream processing platform that utilizes SQL to enhance data analysis, offering improved insights on real-time data.