Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AppWrite VS BEM

Compare AppWrite VS BEM and see what are their differences

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.

BEM logo BEM

BEM โ€” Block Element Modifier is a methodology, that helps you to achieve reusable components and code sharing in the front-end.
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • BEM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-21

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

BEM features and specs

  • Consistency
    BEM enforces a structured way of naming and organizing CSS classes, which promotes consistency across the codebase.
  • Scalability
    The methodology is designed to handle large and complex projects by keeping styles modular and reusable, which helps in maintaining scalability.
  • Maintainability
    By using a clear naming convention, BEM makes it easier for developers to understand and maintain code, even if they weren't the original authors.
  • Flexibility
    BEM allows for flexible and modular component development, making modifications easier without affecting unrelated parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of BEM

  • Verbose Naming
    The class names in BEM can become quite long and verbose, which might make the HTML markup harder to read.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with BEM may need some time to adapt to its conventions and understand the methodology well.
  • No Enforced Hierarchy
    BEM does not inherently enforce any specific hierarchy or structure among elements, which might lead to inconsistencies if not carefully managed.
  • Increased Initial Setup
    Implementing BEM from scratch can involve significant upfront planning and setup, which might be seen as an overhead for smaller projects.

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

AppWrite videos

No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BEM videos

BEM REVIEW! is Bem worth watching?

More videos:

  • Review - BEM - First Impressions
  • Review - Bem Episode 1 Discussion/ Review BEM HAS THE MUSIC!!!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppWrite and BEM)
Developer Tools
88 88%
12% 12
Backend As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppWrite and BEM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppWrite and BEM

AppWrite Reviews

  1. Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Firebase
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Self hosted

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwriteโ€™s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. Itโ€™s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

BEM Reviews

We have no reviews of BEM yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite should be more popular than BEM. It has been mentiond 178 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppWrite mentions (178)

  • Creating a Chatbot that actually Stands Out! (vibe coded version)๐Ÿฆ–
    Initially, I was using the Supabase free tier, but I was hitting the limits, and my app was becoming stale. Then I switched to Appwrite. Both are totally different; one is SQL, while the latter one is NoSQL. Although use node-appwrite package to skip the manual schema add-ons. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • The future of coding: Cursor, AI, and the rise of backend automation with Appwrite
    Appwrite is an open-source platform that simplifies backend setup by providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and hosting all in one place. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • How to Use Appwrite in Android Jetpack Compose
    I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)
    Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโ€™re hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ€“ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

BEM mentions (49)

  • Why CSS Is So Hard for Generative AIs to Understand?
    Beyond the countless ways to achieve the same result, there are just as many methodologies for writing CSS itself. Have you ever came across BEM, SMACSS, OOCSS, atomic CSS, etc. If not, then you can add yours to the list. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • hearing Michael Scott.
    SCSS makes it easier to use mixing and variables. I'm exploring it's applications for Codepen as well as the use of BEM to modularize reusable CSS components. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • The CSS Odyssey: Why I Turned back to CSS After Trying Everything Else
    Style conflicts is one. Although CSS class definitions are placed in reverse import order, problems still occur in Next.js when some pieces only appear in page but not layout CSS bundles. Following BEM (Block Element Modifier) and "Composition over Extension" patterns to separate concerns helps avoid styling collisions significantly. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • :where() :is() my mind?
    BEM encourages a flat structure with minimal nesting and specificity, making styles easier to read and maintain. It significantly reduces the risk of unintended style overrides and enhances modularity. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • SASS, CSS, or Tailwind: Which One Should You Choose?
    Keep in mind you also have to use BEM. If you use just SASS, there are little to no advantages compared with CSS. I am going to cover BEM in a separate article, but for your understanding, BEM is a methodology for writing good CSS. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppWrite and BEM, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

styled-components - styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.

Clerk - Clerk.io, the artificial intelligence for e-commerce that knows your customers interests.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.