Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AppWrite VS Anchor.dev

Compare AppWrite VS Anchor.dev and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.

Anchor.dev logo Anchor.dev

Developer-friendly private CAs for Internal TLS
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • Anchor.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-03-25

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

Anchor.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Anchor.dev offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of building and deploying smart contracts, making it accessible for developers with varying levels of experience.
  • Efficiency
    The platform streamlines the development workflow by providing comprehensive tools and libraries, which can significantly reduce the time and effort required to go from concept to deployment.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Anchor.dev provides extensive documentation and resources, which help developers learn and troubleshoot, thereby enhancing productivity and reducing onboarding time.
  • Active Community
    The platform is supported by an active community, offering access to forums, tutorials, and community-driven support that can be invaluable for developers facing challenges.

Possible disadvantages of Anchor.dev

  • Cost
    Depending on the pricing model, using Anchor.dev could incur significant costs, especially for more extensive projects, which might not be viable for individuals or small teams.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there might still be a learning curve for developers who are new to smart contract development or unfamiliar with the platform's specifics.
  • Platform Limitations
    As with any specific development platform, there may be limitations in customization or functionality that could restrict developers depending on their project requirements.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Relying heavily on a single development platform may lead to challenges if the platform changes its services, pricing, or becomes unavailable.

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppWrite and Anchor.dev)

AppWrite

Anchor.dev

Developer Tools
95 95%
Developer Tools
5% 5
Backend As A Service
100 100%
Backend As A Service
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
Realtime Backend / API
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppWrite and Anchor.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppWrite and Anchor.dev

AppWrite Reviews

  1. dndiel
    Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    🏁 Competitors: Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    👎 Cons:    Self hosted
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwrite’s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. It’s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
Source: digitalcruch.com
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

Anchor.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Anchor.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite seems to be a lot more popular than Anchor.dev. While we know about 176 links to AppWrite, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Anchor.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppWrite mentions (176)

  • How to Use Appwrite in Android Jetpack Compose
    I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)
    Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. We’re hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: – Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Flutter vs Native: Why Flutter Wins for TV App Development
    Flutter plays well with modern backend solutions like Firebase, Supabase, AWS Amplify, Appwrite, and PocketBase. This gives you a variety of options to choose from whether you are an indie developer, startup, established company, agency, or enterprise. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 5 Tools Every Developer Must Use in 2024
    Appwrite also allows you to manage your application's backend services through a simple and intuitive dashboard, making it easy to monitor and control your resources. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Anchor.dev mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Lcl.host for Teams – team-wide local HTTPS in development
    Hi HN! I'm part of the Anchor (https://anchor.dev/) team building lcl.host: We launched lcl.host in March as the easiest way to get HTTPS in your development environment, and today we're launching new features to make lcl.host the best local HTTPS experience for development teams. Before lcl.host, setting up HTTPS in your local development environment was an annoyance, but getting your team to... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • HTTPS on Localhost with Next.js
    | Next Steps | Now that you have local HTTPS setup, let's automate certificate provisioning | so you never have to manually provision future certificates again. | | We've generated an Anchor.dev setup guide for your application with | instructions for automating certificate provisioning inside your application. - Opened https://anchor.dev//services//guide. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppWrite and Anchor.dev, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

lcl.host - Get HTTPS in your local dev environment

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

GraphQl Editor - Editor for GraphQL that lets you draw GraphQL schemas using visual nodes

PocketBase.io - Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.

Android Studio - Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA

Loading...